From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
To: "Annapurve, Vishal" <vannapurve@google.com>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>,
"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Li, Xiaoyao" <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
"Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>,
"Zhao, Yan Y" <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"kas@kernel.org" <kas@kernel.org>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
"tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com" <tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"binbin.wu@linux.intel.com" <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>, "bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@intel.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] x86/tdx: Skip clearing reclaimed pages unless X86_BUG_TDX_PW_MCE is present
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 15:08:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <677013fe62bfa7e3382a288d4a928a8a980df245.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250722131533.106473-3-adrian.hunter@intel.com>
On Tue, 2025-07-22 at 16:15 +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Avoid clearing reclaimed TDX private pages unless the platform is affected
> by the X86_BUG_TDX_PW_MCE erratum. This significantly reduces VM shutdown
> time on unaffected systems.
>
> Background
>
> KVM currently clears reclaimed TDX private pages using MOVDIR64B, which:
>
> - Clears the TD Owner bit (which identifies TDX private memory) and
> integrity metadata without triggering integrity violations.
> - Clears poison from cache lines without consuming it, avoiding MCEs on
> access (refer TDX Module Base spec. 16.5. Handling Machine Check
> Events during Guest TD Operation).
16.5 could move around. We probably want to put the date, or document version
like (348549-006US).
>
> The TDX module also uses MOVDIR64B to initialize private pages before use.
> If cache flushing is needed, it sets TDX_FEATURES.CLFLUSH_BEFORE_ALLOC.
> However, KVM currently flushes unconditionally, refer commit 94c477a751c7b
> ("x86/virt/tdx: Add SEAMCALL wrappers to add TD private pages")
>
> In contrast, when private pages are reclaimed, the TDX Module handles
> flushing via the TDH.PHYMEM.CACHE.WB SEAMCALL.
>
> Problem
>
> Clearing all private pages during VM shutdown is costly. For guests
> with a large amount of memory it can take minutes.
>
> Solution
>
> TDX Module Base Architecture spec. documents that private pages reclaimed
> from a TD should be initialized using MOVDIR64B, in order to avoid
> integrity violation or TD bit mismatch detection when later being read
> using a shared HKID, refer April 2025 spec. "Page Initialization" in
> section "8.6.2. Platforms not Using ACT: Required Cache Flush and
> Initialization by the Host VMM"
>
> That is an overstatement and will be clarified in coming versions of the
> spec. In fact, as outlined in "Table 16.2: Non-ACT Platforms Checks on
> Memory" and "Table 16.3: Non-ACT Platforms Checks on Memory Reads in Li
> Mode" in the same spec, there is no issue accessing such reclaimed pages
> using a shared key that does not have integrity enabled. Linux always uses
> KeyID 0 which never has integrity enabled. KeyID 0 is also the TME KeyID
> which disallows integrity, refer "TME Policy/Encryption Algorithm" bit
> description in "Intel Architecture Memory Encryption Technologies" spec
> version 1.6 April 2025. So there is no need to clear pages to avoid
> integrity violations.
>
> There remains a risk of poison consumption. However, in the context of
> TDX, it is expected that there would be a machine check associated with the
> original poisoning. On some platforms that results in a panic. However
> platforms may support "SEAM_NR" Machine Check capability, in which case
> Linux machine check handler marks the page as poisoned, which prevents it
> from being allocated anymore, refer commit 7911f145de5fe ("x86/mce:
> Implement recovery for errors in TDX/SEAM non-root mode")
>
> Improvement
>
> By skipping the clearing step on unaffected platforms, shutdown time
> can improve by up to 40%.
>
> On platforms with the X86_BUG_TDX_PW_MCE erratum (SPR and EMR), continue
> clearing because these platforms may trigger poison on partial writes to
> previously-private pages, even with KeyID 0, refer commit 1e536e1068970
> ("x86/cpu: Detect TDX partial write machine check erratum")
>
Reviewed-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kas@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> ---
>
>
> Changes in V3:
>
> Remove "flush cache" comments (Rick)
> Update function comment to better relate to "quirk" naming (Rick)
> Add "via MOVDIR64B" to comment (Xiaoyao)
> Add Rev'd-by, Ack'd-by tags
>
> Changes in V2:
>
> Improve the comment
>
>
> arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
> index 14d93ed05bd2..a542e4fbf5a8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
> @@ -633,15 +633,19 @@ static int tdmrs_set_up_pamt_all(struct tdmr_info_list *tdmr_list,
> }
>
> /*
> - * Convert TDX private pages back to normal by using MOVDIR64B to
> - * clear these pages. Note this function doesn't flush cache of
> - * these TDX private pages. The caller should make sure of that.
> + * Convert TDX private pages back to normal by using MOVDIR64B to clear these
> + * pages. Typically, any write to the page will convert it from TDX private back
> + * to normal kernel memory. Systems with the X86_BUG_TDX_PW_MCE erratum need to
> + * do the conversion explicitly via MOVDIR64B.
> */
> void tdx_quirk_reset_paddr(unsigned long base, unsigned long size)
> {
> const void *zero_page = (const void *)page_address(ZERO_PAGE(0));
> unsigned long phys, end;
>
> + if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_TDX_PW_MCE))
> + return;
> +
> end = base + size;
> for (phys = base; phys < end; phys += 64)
> movdir64b(__va(phys), zero_page);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-22 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-22 13:15 [PATCH V3 0/2] " Adrian Hunter
2025-07-22 13:15 ` [PATCH V3 1/2] x86/tdx: Eliminate duplicate code in tdx_clear_page() Adrian Hunter
2025-07-22 14:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-07-22 14:48 ` Adrian Hunter
2025-07-22 13:15 ` [PATCH V3 2/2] x86/tdx: Skip clearing reclaimed pages unless X86_BUG_TDX_PW_MCE is present Adrian Hunter
2025-07-22 15:08 ` Edgecombe, Rick P [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=677013fe62bfa7e3382a288d4a928a8a980df245.camel@intel.com \
--to=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®