From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: "Alan D. Brunelle" <Alan.Brunelle@hp.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] Skip I/O merges when disabled
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:59:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <67E36C56-E149-4C87-8788-05BA43C1C2AD@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ve27gz4u.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
On 24/04/2008, at 15.29, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> "Alan D. Brunelle" <Alan.Brunelle@hp.com> writes:
>
>> The block I/O + elevator + I/O scheduler code spends a lot of time
>> trying to merge I/Os -- rightfully so under "normal" circumstances.
>> However, if one were to know that the incoming I/O stream was /very/
>> random in nature, the cycles are wasted. (This can be the case, for
>> example, during OLTP-type runs.)
>>
>> This patch stream adds a per-request_queue tunable that (when set)
>> disables merge attempts, thus freeing up a non-trivial amount of
>> CPU cycles.
>
> It sounds interesting. But explicit tunables are always bad because
> they will be only used by a elite few. Do you think it would be
> possible instead to keep some statistics on how successfull merging
> is and
> when the success rate is very low disable it automatically for some
> time until a time out?
>
> This way nearly everybody could get most of the benefit from this
> change.
Not a good idea IMHO, it's much better with an explicit setting. That
way you don't introduce indeterministic behavior.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-24 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-23 19:08 Alan D. Brunelle
2008-04-23 19:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] Add flag and sysfs interfaces Alan D. Brunelle
2008-04-23 19:14 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] Have __make_request skip merges when disabled Alan D. Brunelle
2008-04-23 19:15 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] Do not use rqhash when merges disabled Alan D. Brunelle
2008-04-24 0:37 ` Aaron Carroll
2008-04-24 0:59 ` Alan D. Brunelle
2008-04-24 2:07 ` Aaron Carroll
2008-04-24 7:09 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/3] Skip I/O merges when disabled Jens Axboe
2008-04-24 12:09 ` Alan D. Brunelle
2008-04-25 8:38 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-25 11:17 ` Alan D. Brunelle
2008-04-25 11:25 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-25 12:06 ` Aaron Carroll
2008-04-25 12:14 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-25 12:17 ` Alan D. Brunelle
2008-04-28 16:36 ` Alan D. Brunelle
2008-04-29 7:37 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-24 20:38 ` Alan D. Brunelle
2008-04-24 13:29 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-24 13:59 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2008-04-24 14:13 ` Alan D. Brunelle
2008-04-24 15:05 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-24 22:04 ` Carl Henrik Lunde
2008-04-25 7:13 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-24 14:15 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-24 15:04 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-24 15:53 ` David Collier-Brown
2008-04-24 16:29 ` Alan D. Brunelle
2008-04-24 13:31 ` Alan D. Brunelle
2008-04-24 13:43 ` Alan D. Brunelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=67E36C56-E149-4C87-8788-05BA43C1C2AD@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=Alan.Brunelle@hp.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®