Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf cs-etm: Print size using consistent format

[German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>]

Hi Mathieu,

Thanks for your feedback. I will keep these points in mind for future 
submissions.

On 23/09/2021 17:24, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Hi German,
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 04:46:31PM +0100, German Gomez wrote:
>> [...]
> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
>
> A couple of things to improve for your next interactions with the Linux community:
>
> 1) Using a cover letter, even for small changes, is always a good idea.
> 2) RB tags should be picked up publicly rather than done internally and added to
> a patchset.
> 3) Keep patches semantically grouped.  Here patches 04 and 05 have nothing to do
> with 01, 02 and 03.
Did you perhaps mean separating 01 and 02 from the rest? I grouped 03 to 
05 because
they were related to snapshot mode.

Thanks,
German

>
> Moreover Arnaldo queues changes to the perf tools but I don't see him CC'ed to
> this patchset.  As such he will not see your work.  Ask James about how to
> proceed when submitting patches to the perf tools.
>
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
>
>>   		     cs_etm_decoder__get_name(etmq->decoder), buffer->size);
>>   
>>   	do {
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>>