From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
To: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: Fix deadlock in shutdown ioctl
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 14:48:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <67bd2926-6851-0544-c24a-85dfa72aa70f@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180515075747.GA6293@codeaurora.org>
On 2018/5/15 15:57, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:39:42AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2018/5/10 21:20, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
>>> f2fs_ioc_shutdown() ioctl gets stuck in the below path
>>> when going down with full sync (F2FS_GOING_DOWN_FULLSYNC)
>>> option.
>>>
>>> __switch_to+0x90/0xc4
>>> percpu_down_write+0x8c/0xc0
>>> freeze_super+0xec/0x1e4
>>> freeze_bdev+0xc4/0xcc
>>> f2fs_ioctl+0xc0c/0x1ce0
>>> f2fs_compat_ioctl+0x98/0x1f0
>>>
>>> Fix this by not holding write access during this ioctl.
>>
>> I think we can just remove lock coverage for F2FS_GOING_DOWN_FULLSYNC path, for
>> other path, we need to keep as it is.
>>
>
> Thanks, I thought about it too but then I checked that XFS shutdown ioctl is
> not taking any lock for this ioctl. Hence, I followed the same in F2FS.
> Do you know why XFS is not taking any lock?
I don't know. :(
> Is it really needed in shutdown ioctl?
IMO, yes, we should keep freeze and remount be aware of the shutdown operation.
Thanks,
>
> --
> Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-16 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-10 13:20 Sahitya Tummala
2018-05-14 3:39 ` Chao Yu
2018-05-15 7:57 ` Sahitya Tummala
2018-05-16 6:48 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2018-05-16 7:32 ` Sahitya Tummala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=67bd2926-6851-0544-c24a-85dfa72aa70f@huawei.com \
--to=yuchao0@huawei.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stummala@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®