From: Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
"daniel.thompson@linaro.org" <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
"andrea.merello@gmail.com" <andrea.merello@gmail.com>,
"radoslaw.pietrzyk@gmail.com" <radoslaw.pietrzyk@gmail.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
Ludovic BARRE <ludovic.barre@st.com>,
"Olivier BIDEAU" <olivier.bideau@st.com>,
Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@st.com>,
"gabriel.fernandez.st@gmail.com" <gabriel.fernandez.st@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v4] clk: stm32h7: Add stm32h743 clock driver
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 09:27:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <67be49fc-ca1b-338c-913e-a0cd19c55697@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170630185403.GN22780@codeaurora.org>
On 06/30/2017 08:54 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 06/30, Gabriel FERNANDEZ wrote:
>>
>> On 06/30/2017 02:20 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> On 06/29, Gabriel FERNANDEZ wrote:
>>>> On 06/28/2017 05:59 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>>> On 06/27, Gabriel FERNANDEZ wrote:
>>>>>> On 06/22/2017 12:07 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>>>>> readl_poll_timeout?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> if i use readl_poll_timeout (wich use 'ktime_get()') it can be
>>>>>> operational only after the selection of clocksource ? (device_initcall).
>>>>>> And then if a driver turn on a clock before, it could blocked the linux
>>>>>> console ?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Ok. I wonder if we could add some sort of starting check to
>>>>> readl_poll_timeout() that tests system_state for booting vs.
>>>>> scheduling? That should be sufficient to handle this case?
>>>>>
>>>> Oops i think i understood my problem...
>>>> i used readl_poll_timeout in atomic context.
>>>> I have to move my code in the .prepare ops.
>>>>
>>>> If you are ok with that i will send a v5
>>>>
>>> There's readl_poll_timeout_atomic() for those modes.
>>>
>> yes it's exactly the test i made (use 'readl_poll_timeout()_atomic' in
>> .enable ops) but i'm blocked.
>>
>> if i do the same in .prepare ops with 'readl_poll_timeout()' it's ok.
> I'm still confused. readl_poll_timeout_atomic() uses ktime_get(),
> and so does readl_poll_timeout(), so how does moving to the
> prepare op fix the problem? What's the actual problem?
>
Yes both use ktime_get().
The issue concerns internal/external oscillator clocks (time
stabilization could be long) and
if a driver wants to enable one these clocks before device_initcall().
By default the clocksource is the jiffies until the end of the boot
(fs_initcall)
Then after, the best clocksource is selected (arm_system_timer or stm32
timer, etc...)
There is no problem after because the counter is a hardware register.
But the jiffies counter is incremented by interruption and enable op
does not allow to be interrupted. (we can with prepare op).
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-05 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-07 6:59 gabriel.fernandez
2017-06-21 22:07 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-22 14:20 ` Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2017-06-27 12:17 ` Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2017-06-28 15:59 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-29 13:41 ` Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2017-06-30 0:20 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-30 7:14 ` Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2017-06-30 18:54 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-07-05 9:27 ` Gabriel FERNANDEZ [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=67be49fc-ca1b-338c-913e-a0cd19c55697@st.com \
--to=gabriel.fernandez@st.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=amelie.delaunay@st.com \
--cc=andrea.merello@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gabriel.fernandez.st@gmail.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=ludovic.barre@st.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=nico@linaro.org \
--cc=olivier.bideau@st.com \
--cc=radoslaw.pietrzyk@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome