mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] linux 4.4 Regression: 100% cpu usage on idle pv guest under Xen with single vcpu.
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 18:30:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <67dc17a583264f1b75071de217dbc6cb@eikelenboom.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <565F0666.9030602@citrix.com>

On 2015-12-02 15:55, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 28/11/15 15:47, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> genirq: Flags mismatch irq 8. 00000000 (hvc_console) vs. 00000000 
>> (rtc0)
> 
> We shouldn't register an rtc_cmos device because its legacy irq
> conflicts with the irq needed for hvc0.  For a multi VCPU guest irq 8 
> is
> in use for the pv spinlocks and this gets requested first, preventing
> the rtc device from probing.
> 
> Does this patch fix it for you?
> 
> David

It does, thanks.

Reported-and-tested-by: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>

--
Sander

> 8<--------------------
> x86: rtc_cmos platform device requires legacy irqs
> 
> Adding the rtc platform device when there are no legacy irqs (no
> legacy PIC) causes a conflict with other devices that end up using the
> same irq number.
> 
> In a single VCPU PV guest we should have:
> 
> /proc/interrupts:
>            CPU0
>   0:       4934  xen-percpu-virq      timer0
>   1:          0  xen-percpu-ipi       spinlock0
>   2:          0  xen-percpu-ipi       resched0
>   3:          0  xen-percpu-ipi       callfunc0
>   4:          0  xen-percpu-virq      debug0
>   5:          0  xen-percpu-ipi       callfuncsingle0
>   6:          0  xen-percpu-ipi       irqwork0
>   7:        321   xen-dyn-event     xenbus
>   8:         90   xen-dyn-event     hvc_console
>   ...
> 
> But hvc_console cannot get its interrupt because it is already in use
> by rtc0 and the console does not work.
> 
>   genirq: Flags mismatch irq 8. 00000000 (hvc_console) vs. 00000000 
> (rtc0)
> 
> The rtc_cmos device requires a particular legacy irq so don't add it
> if there are no legacy irqs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c
> index cd96852..07c70f1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>  #include <asm/time.h>
>  #include <asm/intel-mid.h>
>  #include <asm/rtc.h>
> +#include <asm/i8259.h>
> 
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
>  /*
> @@ -200,6 +201,10 @@ static __init int add_rtc_cmos(void)
>  	}
>  #endif
> 
> +	/* RTC uses legacy IRQs. */
> +	if (!nr_legacy_irqs())
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
>  	platform_device_register(&rtc_device);
>  	dev_info(&rtc_device.dev,
>  		 "registered platform RTC device (no PNP device found)\n");

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-02 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-28 15:47 Sander Eikelenboom
     [not found] ` <20151130214513.GF14317@char.us.oracle.com>
2015-11-30 21:46   ` [Xen-devel] " Sander Eikelenboom
2015-11-30 22:54     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-11-30 22:55       ` Sander Eikelenboom
2015-12-01 22:47         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-12-01 23:00           ` Sander Eikelenboom
2015-12-01 23:19             ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-12-01 23:30               ` Sander Eikelenboom
2015-12-01 23:41                 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-12-01 23:44                   ` Sander Eikelenboom
2015-12-02 10:04                   ` Sander Eikelenboom
2015-12-01 22:51       ` Sander Eikelenboom
2015-12-01 23:05         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-11-30 22:47   ` Sander Eikelenboom
2015-12-02 14:15 ` David Vrabel
2015-12-02 14:55 ` David Vrabel
2015-12-02 17:30   ` Sander Eikelenboom [this message]
     [not found] <CAPQw5rmKWRoYQa4Lt9ZyBzKuK3kKSXkd_YoYWO_cVfKoL+EMbw@mail.gmail.com>
2015-12-14 21:07 ` Sander Eikelenboom

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=67dc17a583264f1b75071de217dbc6cb@eikelenboom.it \
    --to=linux@eikelenboom.it \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome