From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B55C65BAE for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 16:28:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CC8B20880 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 16:28:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544718492; bh=BI966aFaj0DfXReiODJw4nqzaFnzoF11ygQdS85S7jY=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=WOBOQ8g322hNnL7lAM+dYn6CUeTyxPnf9jJhl1n315pBT7evm85B80GMwz3j94/JU 3+MP9DNijRecoFiI0NXRr3vxgS0I2uyhClF8ZcGCEMJM284tWxwKxeU3gfU2R/kP9v fzpwzj+JGquRnIpKGJMMR0nhxZ7MDwt+bBfFnVxI= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6CC8B20880 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729332AbeLMQ2L (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2018 11:28:11 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:46706 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728059AbeLMQ2L (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2018 11:28:11 -0500 Received: from [10.80.45.159] (unknown [71.69.156.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0C4662086D; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 16:28:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544718490; bh=BI966aFaj0DfXReiODJw4nqzaFnzoF11ygQdS85S7jY=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=i0WKkaMQKnKnxqLrZe1LeDHJfM7qFuexKYha17c0h8rQIWhk3LgvFBildgDINjZjR mlXd/IwdDEdRin0JgN9ZFemr9J1ZzbR1asWUx6uMJhHnDTq0Wawq9RxGFs9Zi5UC1D l+L/h35CzRv/NteUFW8AZQOLlYGgQ8Soi+spanHw= Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/5] ACPI / OSL: Stub out acpi_os_read_pci_configuration when CONFIG_PCI is unset To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <20181213044833.23952-1-okaya@kernel.org> <20181213044833.23952-3-okaya@kernel.org> From: Sinan Kaya Message-ID: <67f817ff-4e81-d971-c92f-897d8f6343b8@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 11:28:08 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/13/2018 11:20 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 5:04 PM Sinan Kaya wrote: >> >> On 12/13/2018 6:15 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 5:49 AM Sinan Kaya wrote: >>>> >>>> Getting ready to allow CONFIG_PCI to be disabled with ACPI enabled. Stub >>>> out acpi_os_read_pci_configuration function that depend on PCI. >>> >>> Why don't you merge this with the next patch? Is there any particular >>> reason why they should be separate? >>> >> >> I could. I thought it would be easier to review small pieces. >> >> Let me know your preference. > > IMO it would be better to merge them. > OK. I'll merge and post a new version tonight.