From: Nicolas Morey <nmorey@suse.com>
To: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>,
Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Tristan Madani <tristmd@gmail.com>,
"open list:SOFT-ROCE DRIVER (rxe)" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/rxe: Use validated num_sge in local buffer
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 23:44:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <681ae665-523a-441b-bbd8-dbae51ee64f1@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27376486-9cab-4d42-8ed7-36e13231dd91@linux.dev>
On 2026-09-07 23:20, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
> 在 2026/9/7 9:15, Nicolas Morey 写道:
>> For both SRQ and non-SRQ receive paths, the WQE is copied into a local
>> buffer to provide a kernel-owned, validated copy. While calculating the
>> memcpy size from the validated num_sge prevents overflow during the
>> copy, memcpy() itself still copies num_sge from shared memory.
>>
>> A concurrent userspace modification before or during memcpy() leaves
>> an unvalidated num_sge in the local buffer, leading to potential
>> out-of-bounds reads in rxe_resp_check_length() and copy_data().
>>
>
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Thanks for the patch. The logic makes total sense to prevent the TOCTOU race condition after memcpy.
>
> Just out of curiosity, do you happen to have a reproducer or a POC script that demonstrates this race in practice?
>
> It would be great to know if this can be reliably reproduced or integrated into testing setups (like rdma-core tests, or tools/testing/selftests/rdma) to catch similar double-read issues in the future.
>
No reproducer or PoC sadly. I haven't tried to make one though.
This got caught by one of our AI tools when checking the backport of CVE-2026-74377.
I assumed from the 2 existing fixes (ending up as CVEs) that this could happened.
Nicolas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-07 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 16:15 Nicolas Morey
2026-09-07 21:20 ` Zhu Yanjun
2026-09-07 21:44 ` Nicolas Morey [this message]
2026-09-08 3:07 ` Zhu Yanjun
2026-09-08 7:35 ` Nicolas Morey
2026-09-09 14:15 ` Zhu Yanjun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=681ae665-523a-441b-bbd8-dbae51ee64f1@suse.com \
--to=nmorey@suse.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tristmd@gmail.com \
--cc=yanjun.zhu@linux.dev \
--cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®