From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753834AbYE1S15 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2008 14:27:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752241AbYE1S1s (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2008 14:27:48 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.237]:8092 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752195AbYE1S1s (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2008 14:27:48 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=K+7JzE65Iwymb1Lqa5Rk9LaiYkjDU9CcQLoVurGELHAH1RmjgBXKZVhSH8MhJguY6u2XQmem1naLo2sXJxy/ryxwhwlyOc6ituEvyqWQN27vvD6itxmYb9wLSw92O6LbhsD4K7dXhkniqpspD58C1ulNKOu5TuUIyvWZisL9/z8= Message-ID: <6844644e0805281127s47be5b92i71b9684fb41cc596@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 14:27:47 -0400 From: "Doug Reiland" To: linux-kernel Subject: Re: Kbuild changes since 2.6.21?? In-Reply-To: <6844644e0805280923q6ae8fdd6pcf92f726f420afe4@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6844644e0805280923q6ae8fdd6pcf92f726f420afe4@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org By bad, drivers/power/Makefile is ok. I thought I reproduced the issue there. On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Doug Reiland wrote: > There are some makefiles that look at CONFIG_XXXX variables to make > decisions. For example, drivers/power/Makefile has the following > lines: > > ifeq ($(CONFIG_SYSFS),y) > power_supply-objs += power_supply_sysfs.o > endif > > > If I run make clean or make mrproper, it doesn't see CONFIG_SYSFS set > anymore so it doesn't cleanup power_supply_sysfs.o. > > This is for 2.6.25, but I think this use to work for 2.6.21. I am > using drivers/power/Makefile as an example, but I am seeing the same > thing for my driver's Makefile. > > Thanks in advance. >