From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, peterz@infradead.org,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com,
nadav.amit@gmail.com, kernel-team@meta.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, jannh@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/12] x86/mm: add INVLPGB support code
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:21:47 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <685632f2-44a4-a7fd-063b-1d426896f297@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250112155453.1104139-6-riel@surriel.com>
On 1/12/25 09:53, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Add invlpgb.h with the helper functions and definitions needed to use
> broadcast TLB invalidation on AMD EPYC 3 and newer CPUs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/invlpgb.h | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 96 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/invlpgb.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/invlpgb.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/invlpgb.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d62e3733a1ab
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/invlpgb.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef _ASM_X86_INVLPGB
> +#define _ASM_X86_INVLPGB
> +
> +#include <vdso/bits.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * INVLPGB does broadcast TLB invalidation across all the CPUs in the system.
> + *
> + * The INVLPGB instruction is weakly ordered, and a batch of invalidations can
> + * be done in a parallel fashion.
> + *
> + * TLBSYNC is used to ensure that pending INVLPGB invalidations initiated from
> + * this CPU have completed.
> + */
> +static inline void __invlpgb(unsigned long asid, unsigned long pcid, unsigned long addr,
> + int extra_count, bool pmd_stride, unsigned long flags)
> +{
> + u32 edx = (pcid << 16) | asid;
> + u32 ecx = (pmd_stride << 31);
> + u64 rax = addr | flags;
> +
> + /* Protect against negative numbers. */
> + extra_count = max(extra_count, 0);
> + ecx |= extra_count;
A bad ECX value (ECX[15:0] > invlpgb_count_max) will result in a #GP, is
that ok?
Thanks,
Tom
> +
> + asm volatile("invlpgb" : : "a" (rax), "c" (ecx), "d" (edx));
> +}
> +
> +/* Wait for INVLPGB originated by this CPU to complete. */
> +static inline void tlbsync(void)
> +{
> + asm volatile("tlbsync");
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * INVLPGB can be targeted by virtual address, PCID, ASID, or any combination
> + * of the three. For example:
> + * - INVLPGB_VA | INVLPGB_INCLUDE_GLOBAL: invalidate all TLB entries at the address
> + * - INVLPGB_PCID: invalidate all TLB entries matching the PCID
> + *
> + * The first can be used to invalidate (kernel) mappings at a particular
> + * address across all processes.
> + *
> + * The latter invalidates all TLB entries matching a PCID.
> + */
> +#define INVLPGB_VA BIT(0)
> +#define INVLPGB_PCID BIT(1)
> +#define INVLPGB_ASID BIT(2)
> +#define INVLPGB_INCLUDE_GLOBAL BIT(3)
> +#define INVLPGB_FINAL_ONLY BIT(4)
> +#define INVLPGB_INCLUDE_NESTED BIT(5)
> +
> +/* Flush all mappings for a given pcid and addr, not including globals. */
> +static inline void invlpgb_flush_user(unsigned long pcid,
> + unsigned long addr)
> +{
> + __invlpgb(0, pcid, addr, 0, 0, INVLPGB_PCID | INVLPGB_VA);
> + tlbsync();
> +}
> +
> +static inline void invlpgb_flush_user_nr_nosync(unsigned long pcid,
> + unsigned long addr,
> + int nr, bool pmd_stride)
> +{
> + __invlpgb(0, pcid, addr, nr - 1, pmd_stride, INVLPGB_PCID | INVLPGB_VA);
> +}
> +
> +/* Flush all mappings for a given PCID, not including globals. */
> +static inline void invlpgb_flush_single_pcid_nosync(unsigned long pcid)
> +{
> + __invlpgb(0, pcid, 0, 0, 0, INVLPGB_PCID);
> +}
> +
> +/* Flush all mappings, including globals, for all PCIDs. */
> +static inline void invlpgb_flush_all(void)
> +{
> + __invlpgb(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, INVLPGB_INCLUDE_GLOBAL);
> + tlbsync();
> +}
> +
> +/* Flush addr, including globals, for all PCIDs. */
> +static inline void invlpgb_flush_addr_nosync(unsigned long addr, int nr)
> +{
> + __invlpgb(0, 0, addr, nr - 1, 0, INVLPGB_INCLUDE_GLOBAL);
> +}
> +
> +/* Flush all mappings for all PCIDs except globals. */
> +static inline void invlpgb_flush_all_nonglobals(void)
> +{
> + __invlpgb(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> + tlbsync();
> +}
> +
> +#endif /* _ASM_X86_INVLPGB */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> index 8fe3b2dda507..dba5caa4a9f4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
> #include <asm/special_insns.h>
> #include <asm/smp.h>
> +#include <asm/invlpgb.h>
> #include <asm/invpcid.h>
> #include <asm/pti.h>
> #include <asm/processor-flags.h>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-13 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-12 15:53 [RFC PATCH v4 00/10] AMD broadcast TLB invalidation Rik van Riel
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] x86/mm: make MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE unconditional Rik van Riel
2025-01-14 12:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] x86/mm: remove pv_ops.mmu.tlb_remove_table call Rik van Riel
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] x86/mm: consolidate full flush threshold decision Rik van Riel
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] x86/mm: get INVLPGB count max from CPUID Rik van Riel
2025-01-13 15:50 ` Jann Horn
2025-01-13 21:08 ` Rik van Riel
2025-01-13 22:53 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] x86/mm: add INVLPGB support code Rik van Riel
2025-01-13 14:21 ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2025-01-13 21:10 ` Rik van Riel
2025-01-14 14:29 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-01-14 15:05 ` Dave Hansen
2025-01-14 15:23 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-01-14 15:47 ` Rik van Riel
2025-01-14 16:30 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-01-14 16:41 ` Dave Hansen
2025-01-13 17:24 ` Jann Horn
2025-01-14 1:33 ` Rik van Riel
2025-01-14 18:24 ` Michael Kelley
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] x86/mm: use INVLPGB for kernel TLB flushes Rik van Riel
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] x86/tlb: use INVLPGB in flush_tlb_all Rik van Riel
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] x86/mm: use broadcast TLB flushing for page reclaim TLB flushing Rik van Riel
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] x86/mm: enable broadcast TLB invalidation for multi-threaded processes Rik van Riel
2025-01-13 13:09 ` Nadav Amit
2025-01-14 3:13 ` Rik van Riel
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] x86,tlb: do targeted broadcast flushing from tlbbatch code Rik van Riel
2025-01-13 17:05 ` Jann Horn
2025-01-13 17:48 ` Jann Horn
2025-01-13 21:16 ` Rik van Riel
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] x86/mm: enable AMD translation cache extensions Rik van Riel
2025-01-13 11:32 ` Andrew Cooper
2025-01-14 1:28 ` Rik van Riel
2025-01-12 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] x86/mm: only invalidate final translations with INVLPGB Rik van Riel
2025-01-13 17:11 ` Jann Horn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=685632f2-44a4-a7fd-063b-1d426896f297@amd.com \
--to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®