Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: regulator: Add dt property

[Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@9elements.com>]

Hi Zev,

On 20-04-2023 04:11 pm, Zev Weiss wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 01:22:30AM PDT, Naresh Solanki wrote:
>> Hi Zev,
>>
>> On 20-04-2023 05:31 am, Zev Weiss wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 07:50:50AM PDT, Naresh Solanki wrote:
>>>> Add DT property regulator-supplies.
>>>> This enables us to couple one or more regulator output to gether. This
>>>> is use in case of Single connector having 2 or more supplies.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Naresh Solanki <Naresh.Solanki@9elements.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../bindings/regulator/regulator-output.yaml         | 12 +++++++++---
>>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git 
>>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator-output.yaml 
>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator-output.yaml
>>>> index 078b37a1a71a..17f683d3c1f3 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator-output.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator-output.yaml
>>>> @@ -21,13 +21,19 @@ properties:
>>>>   compatible:
>>>>     const: regulator-output
>>>>
>>>> -  vout-supply:
>>>> +  regulator-supplies:
>>>>     description:
>>>> -      Phandle of the regulator supplying the output.
>>>> +      Specifies the name of the output supply provided by the 
>>>> regulator.
>>>> +      Defaults to "vout".
>>>> +    default: "vout"
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Was this meant to be specified as a string-array to allow providing 
>>> multiple names?
>> Yes. This is string-array.
> 
> Okay -- in that case I think it should include
> 
>    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string-array
Ack
> 
>>>
>>>> +patternProperties:
>>>> +  ".*-supply":
>>>> +    description:
>>>> +      Specified the phandle for various supplies
>>>>
>>>> required:
>>>>   - compatible
>>>> -  - vout-supply
>>>>
>>>> additionalProperties: false
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think it would be nice to also update the examples to show what a 
>>> multi-supply instance would look like.
>> Ack. Will do that.
>>>
>>> A slightly more descriptive subject line would also be good -- "Add 
>>> dt property" is a bit vague.
>> Suggestion ?
>> How about like 'Allow multiple supplies' or 'Add support for multiple 
>> supplies'
> 
> Sure, both of those sound fine to me.
Thanks :)
> 
>>>
>>>> base-commit: c55470f8b0616b0adb758077dbae9b19c5aac005
>>>> -- 
>>>> 2.39.1
>>>>
>> Regards,
>> Naresh
Regards,
Naresh