From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754627AbYIFR3w (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Sep 2008 13:29:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752367AbYIFR3o (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Sep 2008 13:29:44 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.238]:47744 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752150AbYIFR3n (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Sep 2008 13:29:43 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=UAHKDuPp8OxLO+ZFNDjgC0ci/E8RGkCsCCJ/pBxGjX6ehNezjjcyW+7YqXJsflIDRo 57mIXyErOwfDxcmtAcBSxVtt5mjgEiVR9ohFIcsLfu5dgbLPQivXsFY+1Aa6xT3OBDa4 AVU701OOJEIXC0hKQBOqx8J69+cL6bN2dL0kQ= Message-ID: <68676e00809061029y33d40490pa3d1b2c9a30c3552@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 19:29:42 +0200 From: "Luca Tettamanti" To: "Ingo Molnar" Subject: Re: [2.6.27] overlapping early reservations [was: early exception - lockdep related?] Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , "Peter Zijlstra" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20080906172523.GL4856@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <68676e00809051217h3da02a6bld4412b4a2ee3b728@mail.gmail.com> <1220642738.11202.21.camel@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <48C19415.9060108@kernel.org> <68676e00809060620k35679302s42fc0a74aa1dc2d3@mail.gmail.com> <20080906145122.GA7693@elte.hu> <68676e00809061020y440d4c14ye76413d1e0e57e38@mail.gmail.com> <20080906172523.GL4856@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Luca Tettamanti wrote: > >> > or perhaps something made your v2.6.27 bzImage larger so that the >> > overlap happens - while it didnt before. >> >> The compressed image (bzImage) is roughly the same size as older >> kernels (2MB), the uncompressed vmlinux is slightly bigger, but not >> much (~100k) > > hm, that doesnt seem to match the ranges that got printed: Sorry, the sentence above is not very clear: I meant that with 2.6.27 the uncompressed vmlinux is only slightly bigger than older kernels; as you stated the size is 11.6MB. Luca