Re: Does Linux has File Stream mapping support...?

[Bas Westerbaan <bas.westerbaan@gmail.com>]

Maybe an (ugly) way around it would be to simply use a parent process
which captures the stdout of your compiler and writes it to the log
file and prints it to its own stdout.


On 11/18/05, Arijit Das <Arijit.Das@synopsys.com> wrote:
> Ye...I know of tee.
>
> But the issue here is I have a HUGE Compiler (an Simulation tool) in which thousands of places there are "printf" statements to print messages to STDOUT stream. Now, a requirement came up which needs all those messages thrown to STDOUT also to be logged in a LOGFILE (in addition to STDOUT). Yes, this can be done through tee...but the usage model of the compiler doesn't leave that possibility open for me.
>
> So, am looking for a solution inside the Compiler code.
>
> Thanks,
> Arijit
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bodo Eggert [mailto:harvested.in.lkml@7eggert.dyndns.org]
> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 6:00 PM
> To: Arijit Das; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Does Linux has File Stream mapping support...?
>
> Arijit Das <Arijit.Das@synopsys.com> wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to have File Stream Mapping in Linux? What I mean is
> > this...
> >
> > FILE * fp1 = fopen("/foo", "w");
> > FILE * fp2 = fopen("/bar", "w");
> > FILE * fp_common = <Stream_Mapping_Func>(fp1, fp2);
> >
> > fprint(fp_common, "This should be written to both files ... /foo and
> > /bar");
>
> It's a userspace problem. man "tee".
>
> Doing this in the kernel would be horrible.
>
> --
> Ich danke GMX dafür, die Verwendung meiner Adressen mittels per SPF
> verbreiteten Lügen zu sabotieren.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>



--
Bas Westerbaan
http://blog.w-nz.com/
GPG Public Keys: http://w-nz.com/keys/bas.westerbaan.asc