From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5289BC7EE29 for ; Tue, 23 May 2023 12:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236634AbjEWMPL (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 May 2023 08:15:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45640 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231621AbjEWMPJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 May 2023 08:15:09 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C67C109 for ; Tue, 23 May 2023 05:15:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DE95C0067; Tue, 23 May 2023 08:15:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap51 ([10.202.2.101]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 23 May 2023 08:15:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arndb.de; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1684844106; x=1684930506; bh=kA Ht+x8T70GQYnDSilrxwAJfF+iMwu+ILOsuFlWX27k=; b=deLIeor9mA+9amW33f LaNq3Uiu0xp+FUf1hZdSkFIRcPBUtbIsfchH0AydLqLdoO2ctMhAmFaCmDnLxxB5 EeMzSuJPZic4ghBaYZQHCFy0x7janEbDESDGPmcacHdoLNVwPrMfcLswdu6rRx3W Qbcjp1tPGLq9TpikHCwma6ZceEaY6n37Km2aTq0gS3AZXADrq9ERsHWQQaMth0eK 8SJ+ggMEJRoc5ygZb3BZGxNLfZ63AVTqsSGhWmgAYNOQrC5UFBemSDyKQmZwWsCG 35k7evKNcjNlJsGTJQwz59GArwjDYSge9a32hMOssx1eBgziy1ki+J6+HqD40lHD x0VQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1684844106; x=1684930506; bh=kAHt+x8T70GQY nDSilrxwAJfF+iMwu+ILOsuFlWX27k=; b=J/X0Rp5vSLHvL02D95wXQVdpyufk4 fPZqG90TzuBX+ls/kl0eOMjQqmIm9/BcAfskIOILBZc0PjscaPOJMbjR4JmgNtl9 qiMfKeYqJfEOA5SmHvy2DK7I8uvCqiZTZhCIK5SZR+8sg37SljFNYR3kBfULLiGY M/UMdDHURRcsVS4L1BT43v9BfupXZ5RdZGw5+XGlNIwpfM5LpDmGUn+IbA8cRXbs htB1LANzq/nTDXUQsACGnK/8q1M/btmR6PmZ6JdludD1s1S28otDREPeUYHcXC4n +Mpgy5sr4/9jldOgnh/Zr2cxay/eOcO/2noaQ1lW3JOVNqym740SjwemQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrfeejfedggeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvfevufgtsehttdertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedftehr nhguuceuvghrghhmrghnnhdfuceorghrnhgusegrrhhnuggsrdguvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepffehueegteeihfegtefhjefgtdeugfegjeelheejueethfefgeeghfektdek teffnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprg hrnhgusegrrhhnuggsrdguvg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i56a14606:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 69D27B60089; Tue, 23 May 2023 08:15:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.9.0-alpha0-441-ga3ab13cd6d-fm-20230517.001-ga3ab13cd Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <688172c5-fedf-42bb-9fcc-5ec28e83b164@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20230522174635.7acfb42c@xps-13> References: <20230417205654.1982368-1-arnd@kernel.org> <20230522174635.7acfb42c@xps-13> Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 14:14:45 +0200 From: "Arnd Bergmann" To: "Miquel Raynal" , "Arnd Bergmann" Cc: "Richard Weinberger" , "Vignesh Raghavendra" , =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_K=C4=99pie=C5=84?= , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtdchar: mark bits of ioctl handler noinline Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 22, 2023, at 17:46, Miquel Raynal wrote: > > I am about to take this as part of my next fixes PR, should we Cc: > stable? What is the current policy wrt gcc version issues? I think in general we do want stable kernels to work with the latest gcc, so please add the Cc:stable annotation. Arnd