mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xavier  <xavier_qy@163.com>
To: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	 vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	bsegall@google.com,  mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com,
	vschneid@redhat.com,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	oliver.sang@intel.com, tj@kernel.org,  mkoutny@suse.com
Subject: Re:Re:[PATCH-RT sched v4 1/2] RT SCHED: Optimize the enqueue and dequeue operations for rt_se
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 19:22:23 +0800 (CST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <68f44114.90cb.19131b9c26e.Coremail.xavier_qy@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16c12eba.51cb.190e88cdaba.Coremail.xavier_qy@163.com>



Just a reminder, does anyone have any comments or feedback on the patch?

--
Best Regards,
Xavier




At 2024-07-25 14:21:03, "Xavier" <xavier_qy@163.com> wrote:
>
>Hi all,
>
>I would like to ask everyone for your opinions or thoughts on the RT group scheduling
>optimization. At this stage, is it ready to be merged into the corresponding branch?
>Thanks.
>
>--
>Best Regards,
>Xavier
>
>
>
>
>
>At 2024-07-17 11:00:32, "Xavier" <xavier_qy@163.com> wrote:
>>This patch optimizes the enqueue and dequeue of rt_se, the strategy employs
>>a bottom-up removal approach. Specifically, when removing an rt_se at a
>>certain level, if it is determined that the highest priority of the rq
>>associated with that rt_se has not changed, there is no need to continue
>>removing rt_se at higher levels. At this point, only the total number
>>of removed rt_se needs to be recorded, and the rt_nr_running count of
>>higher-level rq should be removed accordingly.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Xavier <xavier_qy@163.com>
>>---
>> kernel/sched/debug.c |  48 ++++++++
>> kernel/sched/rt.c    | 287 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> kernel/sched/sched.h |   1 +
>> 3 files changed, 298 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
>>index c1eb9a1afd13..352ee55da25e 100644
>>--- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
>>+++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
>>@@ -712,6 +712,54 @@ void print_cfs_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>> #endif
>> }
>> 
>>+static void print_rt_se(struct seq_file *m, struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
>>+{
>>+	struct task_struct *task;
>>+
>>+#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
>>+	if (rt_se->my_q) {
>>+		SEQ_printf_task_group_path(m, rt_se->my_q->tg, "%s\n");
>>+		return;
>>+	}
>>+#endif
>>+	task = container_of(rt_se, struct task_struct, rt);
>>+	SEQ_printf(m, "	prio-%d, pid-%d, %s\n", task->prio, task->pid, task->comm);
>>+}
>>+
>>+/*shall be called in rq lock*/
>>+void print_rt_rq_task(struct seq_file *m, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
>>+{
>>+	struct rt_prio_array *array = &rt_rq->active;
>>+	struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se;
>>+	struct list_head *queue, *head;
>>+	unsigned long bitmap[2];
>>+	int idx;
>>+	int count = 0;
>>+
>>+	if (!rt_rq->rt_nr_running)
>>+		return;
>>+
>>+	memcpy(bitmap, array->bitmap, sizeof(unsigned long) * 2);
>>+	idx = sched_find_first_bit(bitmap);
>>+	WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= MAX_RT_PRIO);
>>+
>>+	while (1) {
>>+		clear_bit(idx, bitmap);
>>+		queue = array->queue + idx;
>>+		head = queue;
>>+		queue = queue->next;
>>+		do {
>>+			rt_se = list_entry(queue, struct sched_rt_entity, run_list);
>>+			print_rt_se(m, rt_se);
>>+			queue = queue->next;
>>+			count++;
>>+		} while (queue != head);
>>+		idx = sched_find_first_bit(bitmap);
>>+		if (idx >= MAX_RT_PRIO)
>>+			break;
>>+	}
>>+}
>>+
>> void print_rt_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
>> {
>> #ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
>>diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
>>index aa4c1c874fa4..b18c424a50d2 100644
>>--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
>>+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
>>@@ -1113,7 +1113,7 @@ void dec_rt_prio_smp(struct rt_rq *rt_rq, int prio, int prev_prio) {}
>> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>> 
>> #if defined CONFIG_SMP || defined CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
>>-static void
>>+static int
>> inc_rt_prio(struct rt_rq *rt_rq, int prio)
>> {
>> 	int prev_prio = rt_rq->highest_prio.curr;
>>@@ -1122,9 +1122,11 @@ inc_rt_prio(struct rt_rq *rt_rq, int prio)
>> 		rt_rq->highest_prio.curr = prio;
>> 
>> 	inc_rt_prio_smp(rt_rq, prio, prev_prio);
>>+
>>+	return prev_prio > prio;
>> }
>> 
>>-static void
>>+static int
>> dec_rt_prio(struct rt_rq *rt_rq, int prio)
>> {
>> 	int prev_prio = rt_rq->highest_prio.curr;
>>@@ -1149,12 +1151,22 @@ dec_rt_prio(struct rt_rq *rt_rq, int prio)
>> 	}
>> 
>> 	dec_rt_prio_smp(rt_rq, prio, prev_prio);
>>+	if (rt_rq->highest_prio.curr > prio)
>>+		return prio;
>>+	else
>>+		return MAX_RT_PRIO;
>> }
>> 
>> #else
>> 
>>-static inline void inc_rt_prio(struct rt_rq *rt_rq, int prio) {}
>>-static inline void dec_rt_prio(struct rt_rq *rt_rq, int prio) {}
>>+static inline int inc_rt_prio(struct rt_rq *rt_rq, int prio)
>>+{
>>+	return 0;
>>+}
>>+static inline int dec_rt_prio(struct rt_rq *rt_rq, int prio)
>>+{
>>+	return 0;
>>+}
>> 
>> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP || CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED */
>> 
>>@@ -1218,28 +1230,31 @@ unsigned int rt_se_rr_nr_running(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
>> }
>> 
>> static inline
>>-void inc_rt_tasks(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
>>+int inc_rt_tasks(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
>> {
>> 	int prio = rt_se_prio(rt_se);
>>+	int prio_change;
>> 
>> 	WARN_ON(!rt_prio(prio));
>> 	rt_rq->rt_nr_running += rt_se_nr_running(rt_se);
>> 	rt_rq->rr_nr_running += rt_se_rr_nr_running(rt_se);
>> 
>>-	inc_rt_prio(rt_rq, prio);
>>+	prio_change = inc_rt_prio(rt_rq, prio);
>> 	inc_rt_group(rt_se, rt_rq);
>>+	return prio_change;
>> }
>> 
>> static inline
>>-void dec_rt_tasks(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
>>+int dec_rt_tasks(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq, int prio)
>> {
>>+	int prio_changed;
>> 	WARN_ON(!rt_prio(rt_se_prio(rt_se)));
>>-	WARN_ON(!rt_rq->rt_nr_running);
>> 	rt_rq->rt_nr_running -= rt_se_nr_running(rt_se);
>> 	rt_rq->rr_nr_running -= rt_se_rr_nr_running(rt_se);
>> 
>>-	dec_rt_prio(rt_rq, rt_se_prio(rt_se));
>>+	prio_changed = dec_rt_prio(rt_rq, prio);
>> 	dec_rt_group(rt_se, rt_rq);
>>+	return prio_changed;
>> }
>> 
>> /*
>>@@ -1255,12 +1270,13 @@ static inline bool move_entity(unsigned int flags)
>> 	return true;
>> }
>> 
>>-static void __delist_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_prio_array *array)
>>+static void __delist_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se,
>>+						struct rt_prio_array *array, int last_prio)
>> {
>> 	list_del_init(&rt_se->run_list);
>> 
>>-	if (list_empty(array->queue + rt_se_prio(rt_se)))
>>-		__clear_bit(rt_se_prio(rt_se), array->bitmap);
>>+	if (list_empty(array->queue + last_prio))
>>+		__clear_bit(last_prio, array->bitmap);
>> 
>> 	rt_se->on_list = 0;
>> }
>>@@ -1371,7 +1387,12 @@ update_stats_dequeue_rt(struct rt_rq *rt_rq, struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se,
>> 	}
>> }
>> 
>>-static void __enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, unsigned int flags)
>>+/*
>>+ * Returns: -1 indicates that rt_se was not enqueued, 0 indicates that the highest
>>+ * priority of the rq did not change after enqueue, and 1 indicates that the highest
>>+ * priority of the rq changed after enqueue.
>>+ */
>>+static int __enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, unsigned int flags)
>> {
>> 	struct rt_rq *rt_rq = rt_rq_of_se(rt_se);
>> 	struct rt_prio_array *array = &rt_rq->active;
>>@@ -1386,8 +1407,8 @@ static void __enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, unsigned int flag
>> 	 */
>> 	if (group_rq && (rt_rq_throttled(group_rq) || !group_rq->rt_nr_running)) {
>> 		if (rt_se->on_list)
>>-			__delist_rt_entity(rt_se, array);
>>-		return;
>>+			__delist_rt_entity(rt_se, array, rt_se_prio(rt_se));
>>+		return -1;
>> 	}
>> 
>> 	if (move_entity(flags)) {
>>@@ -1402,73 +1423,263 @@ static void __enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, unsigned int flag
>> 	}
>> 	rt_se->on_rq = 1;
>> 
>>-	inc_rt_tasks(rt_se, rt_rq);
>>+	return inc_rt_tasks(rt_se, rt_rq);
>> }
>> 
>>-static void __dequeue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, unsigned int flags)
>>+/**
>>+ * delete rt_se from rt_rq
>>+ *
>>+ * @rt_se		Nodes to be deleted
>>+ * @last_prio	The highest priority of this rt_se before the previous round
>>+ *				of deletion
>>+ * @flags		operation flags
>>+ *
>>+ * Returns: =0 indicates that the highest priority of the current rq did not
>>+ * change during this deletion. >0 indicates it changed, and it returns the
>>+ * previous highest priority to use in the next round of deletion.
>>+ */
>>+static int __dequeue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, int last_prio,
>>+									unsigned int flags)
>> {
>> 	struct rt_rq *rt_rq = rt_rq_of_se(rt_se);
>> 	struct rt_prio_array *array = &rt_rq->active;
>> 
>> 	if (move_entity(flags)) {
>> 		WARN_ON_ONCE(!rt_se->on_list);
>>-		__delist_rt_entity(rt_se, array);
>>+		__delist_rt_entity(rt_se, array, last_prio);
>> 	}
>> 	rt_se->on_rq = 0;
>> 
>>-	dec_rt_tasks(rt_se, rt_rq);
>>+	return dec_rt_tasks(rt_se, rt_rq, last_prio);
>>+}
>>+
>>+static inline void dec_rq_nr_running(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se,
>>+						unsigned int rt, unsigned int rr)
>>+{
>>+	struct rt_rq *rt_rq = rt_rq_of_se(rt_se);
>>+
>>+	rt_rq->rt_nr_running -= rt;
>>+	rt_rq->rr_nr_running -= rr;
>>+}
>>+
>>+static inline void add_rq_nr_running(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se,
>>+						unsigned int rt, unsigned int rr)
>>+{
>>+	struct rt_rq *rt_rq = rt_rq_of_se(rt_se);
>>+
>>+	rt_rq->rt_nr_running += rt;
>>+	rt_rq->rr_nr_running += rr;
>>+}
>>+
>>+static inline bool on_top_rt_rq(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
>>+{
>>+#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
>>+	if (rt_se->parent)
>>+		return false;
>>+#endif
>>+	return true;
>> }
>> 
>> /*
>>- * Because the prio of an upper entry depends on the lower
>>- * entries, we must remove entries top - down.
>>+ * To optimize the enqueue and dequeue of rt_se, this strategy employs a
>>+ * bottom-up removal approach. Specifically, when removing an rt_se at a
>>+ * certain level, if it is determined that the highest priority of the rq
>>+ * associated with that rt_se has not changed, there is no need to continue
>>+ * removing rt_se at higher levels. At this point, only the total number
>>+ * of removed rt_se needs to be recorded, and the rt_nr_running count of
>>+ * higher-level rq should be removed accordingly.
>>+ *
>>+ * For enqueue operations, if an rt_se at a certain level is in the rq,
>>+ * it is still necessary to check the priority of the higher-level rq.
>>+ * If the priority of the higher-level rq is found to be lower than that
>>+ * of the rt_se to be added, it should be removed, as updating the highest
>>+ * priority of the rq during addition will cause the rq to be repositioned
>>+ * in the parent rq.
>>+ *
>>+ * Conversely, for dequeue operations, if an rt_se at a certain level is
>>+ * not in the rq, the operation can be exited immediately to reduce
>>+ * unnecessary checks and handling.
>>+ *
>>+ * The return value refers to the last rt_se that was removed for enqueue
>>+ * operations. And for dequeue operations, it refers to the last rt_se
>>+ * that was either removed or had its rt_nr_running updated.
>>  */
>>-static void dequeue_rt_stack(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, unsigned int flags)
>>+static struct sched_rt_entity *dequeue_rt_stack(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se,
>>+						unsigned int flags, int for_enqueue)
>> {
>>-	struct sched_rt_entity *back = NULL;
>>-	unsigned int rt_nr_running;
>>+	struct sched_rt_entity *last = rt_se;
>>+	struct sched_rt_entity *origin = rt_se;
>>+	unsigned int del_rt_nr = 0;
>>+	unsigned int del_rr_nr = 0;
>>+	int prio_changed = rt_se_prio(rt_se);
>>+	int sub_on_rq = 1;
>> 
>> 	for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se) {
>>-		rt_se->back = back;
>>-		back = rt_se;
>>-	}
>>+		if (on_rt_rq(rt_se)) {
>>+			if (sub_on_rq) {
>>+				/*
>>+				 * The number of tasks removed from the sub-level rt_se also needs
>>+				 * to be subtracted from the rq of the current rt_se, as the current
>>+				 * rt_se's rq no longer includes the number of removed tasks.
>>+				 */
>>+				dec_rq_nr_running(rt_se, del_rt_nr, del_rr_nr);
>>+				if ((prio_changed != MAX_RT_PRIO) ||
>>+					(rt_se_prio(rt_se) > rt_se_prio(origin))) {
>>+					/*
>>+					 * If the removal of the lower-level rt_se causes the
>>+					 * highest priority of the current rq to change, or if the
>>+					 * priority of current rq is lower than the rt_se to be
>>+					 * added, then the current rt_se also needs to be removed
>>+					 * from its parent rq, and the number of deleted tasks
>>+					 * should be accumulated.
>>+					 */
>>+					if (prio_changed == MAX_RT_PRIO)
>>+						prio_changed = rt_se_prio(rt_se);
>>+					del_rt_nr += rt_se_nr_running(rt_se);
>>+					del_rr_nr += rt_se_rr_nr_running(rt_se);
>>+					prio_changed = __dequeue_rt_entity(rt_se,
>>+									prio_changed, flags);
>>+					last = rt_se;
>>+				} else if (!for_enqueue) {
>>+					/* For dequeue, last may only rt_nr_running was modified.*/
>>+					last = rt_se;
>>+				}
>>+			} else {
>>+				/*
>>+				 * Entering this branch must be for enqueue, as dequeue would break
>>+				 * if an rt_se is not online.
>>+				 * If the sub-level node is not online, and the current rt_se's
>>+				 * priority is lower than the one being added, current rt_se need
>>+				 * to be removed.
>>+				 */
>>+				prio_changed = rt_se_prio(rt_se);
>>+				if (prio_changed > rt_se_prio(origin)) {
>>+					del_rt_nr += rt_se_nr_running(rt_se);
>>+					del_rr_nr += rt_se_rr_nr_running(rt_se);
>>+					prio_changed = __dequeue_rt_entity(rt_se,
>>+									prio_changed, flags);
>>+					last = rt_se;
>>+				} else {
>>+					prio_changed = MAX_RT_PRIO;
>>+				}
>>+			}
>> 
>>-	rt_nr_running = rt_rq_of_se(back)->rt_nr_running;
>>+			/*
>>+			 * If the current rt_se is on the top rt_rq, then the already deleted
>>+			 * nodes, plus the count of the rt_rq where current rt_se located,
>>+			 * need to be removed from the top_rt_rq.
>>+			 */
>>+			if (on_top_rt_rq(rt_se)) {
>>+				dequeue_top_rt_rq(rt_rq_of_se(rt_se),
>>+						del_rt_nr + rt_rq_of_se(rt_se)->rt_nr_running);
>>+			}
>>+			sub_on_rq = 1;
>>+		} else if (for_enqueue) {
>>+			struct rt_rq *group_rq = group_rt_rq(rt_se);
>> 
>>-	for (rt_se = back; rt_se; rt_se = rt_se->back) {
>>-		if (on_rt_rq(rt_se))
>>-			__dequeue_rt_entity(rt_se, flags);
>>+			/*
>>+			 * In the case of an enqueue operation, if a certain level is found to be
>>+			 * not online, then the previous counts need to be reset to zero.
>>+			 */
>>+			prio_changed = MAX_RT_PRIO;
>>+			sub_on_rq = 0;
>>+			del_rt_nr = 0;
>>+			del_rr_nr = 0;
>>+
>>+			/*
>>+			 * If the current group is being throttled, then there is no need to check
>>+			 * higher levels since enqueueing will not affect higher-level nodes.
>>+			 */
>>+			if (group_rq && rt_rq_throttled(group_rq))
>>+				break;
>>+
>>+			if (on_top_rt_rq(rt_se))
>>+				dequeue_top_rt_rq(rt_rq_of_se(rt_se),
>>+						rt_rq_of_se(rt_se)->rt_nr_running);
>>+		} else {
>>+			last = rt_se;
>>+			break;
>>+		}
>> 	}
>> 
>>-	dequeue_top_rt_rq(rt_rq_of_se(back), rt_nr_running);
>>+	return last;
>> }
>> 
>> static void enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, unsigned int flags)
>> {
>> 	struct rq *rq = rq_of_rt_se(rt_se);
>>+	struct sched_rt_entity *last;
>>+	unsigned int add_rt_nr = 0;
>>+	unsigned int add_rr_nr = 0;
>>+	int enqueue = 1;
>>+	int prio_change = 1;
>> 
>> 	update_stats_enqueue_rt(rt_rq_of_se(rt_se), rt_se, flags);
>> 
>>-	dequeue_rt_stack(rt_se, flags);
>>-	for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se)
>>-		__enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se, flags);
>>+	last = dequeue_rt_stack(rt_se, flags, 1);
>>+
>>+	for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se) {
>>+		if (enqueue || !on_rt_rq(rt_se) || (prio_change == 1)) {
>>+			prio_change = __enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se, flags);
>>+			if (prio_change >= 0) {
>>+				add_rt_nr = rt_se_nr_running(rt_se);
>>+				add_rr_nr = rt_se_rr_nr_running(rt_se);
>>+			} else {
>>+				add_rt_nr = add_rr_nr = 0;
>>+			}
>>+		} else {
>>+			add_rq_nr_running(rt_se, add_rt_nr, add_rr_nr);
>>+		}
>>+
>>+		if (rt_se == last)
>>+			enqueue = 0;
>>+	}
>>+
>> 	enqueue_top_rt_rq(&rq->rt);
>> }
>> 
>> static void dequeue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, unsigned int flags)
>> {
>> 	struct rq *rq = rq_of_rt_se(rt_se);
>>+	struct sched_rt_entity *last;
>>+	unsigned int add_rt_nr = 0;
>>+	unsigned int add_rr_nr = 0;
>>+	int prio_change = 1;
>> 
>> 	update_stats_dequeue_rt(rt_rq_of_se(rt_se), rt_se, flags);
>> 
>>-	dequeue_rt_stack(rt_se, flags);
>>+	last = dequeue_rt_stack(rt_se, flags, 0);
>> 
>> 	for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se) {
>> 		struct rt_rq *rt_rq = group_rt_rq(rt_se);
>>+		if (rt_rq && rt_rq->rt_nr_running) {
>>+			if (on_rt_rq(rt_se)) {
>>+				add_rq_nr_running(rt_se, add_rt_nr, add_rr_nr);
>>+			} else {
>>+				prio_change = __enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se, flags);
>>+				if (prio_change == 0) {
>>+					/*
>>+					 * If enqueue is successful and the priority of the rq has
>>+					 * not changed, then the parent node only needs to add the
>>+					 * count of the current rt_se. Otherwise, the parent node
>>+					 * will also need to enqueue.
>>+					 */
>>+					add_rt_nr = rt_se_nr_running(rt_se);
>>+					add_rr_nr = rt_se_rr_nr_running(rt_se);
>>+				}
>>+			}
>>+		} else {
>>+			add_rt_nr = add_rr_nr = 0;
>>+		}
>> 
>>-		if (rt_rq && rt_rq->rt_nr_running)
>>-			__enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se, flags);
>>+		/*
>>+		 * last is the rt_se of the last deletion or modification of the
>>+		 * count, so the subsequent rt_se does not need to be updated.
>>+		 */
>>+		if (rt_se == last)
>>+			break;
>> 	}
>>+
>> 	enqueue_top_rt_rq(&rq->rt);
>> }
>> 
>>diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
>>index ef20c61004eb..821d65106d13 100644
>>--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
>>+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
>>@@ -2879,6 +2879,7 @@ extern void print_rt_stats(struct seq_file *m, int cpu);
>> extern void print_dl_stats(struct seq_file *m, int cpu);
>> extern void print_cfs_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
>> extern void print_rt_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct rt_rq *rt_rq);
>>+extern void print_rt_rq_task(struct seq_file *m, struct rt_rq *rt_rq);
>> extern void print_dl_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct dl_rq *dl_rq);
>> 
>> extern void resched_latency_warn(int cpu, u64 latency);
>>-- 
>>2.45.2

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-08 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-27 17:21 [PATCH-RT sched v1 0/2] Optimize the RT group scheduling Xavier
2024-06-27 17:21 ` [PATCH-RT sched v1 1/2] RT SCHED: Optimize the enqueue and dequeue operations for rt_se Xavier
2024-06-28 23:29   ` kernel test robot
2024-06-29  0:20   ` kernel test robot
2024-06-27 17:21 ` [PATCH-RT sched v1 2/2] RT test: Adding test cases for RT group scheduling Xavier
2024-06-29 11:28 ` [PATCH-RT sched v2 0/2] Optimize the " Xavier
2024-06-29 11:28   ` [PATCH-RT sched v2 1/2] RT SCHED: Optimize the enqueue and dequeue operations for rt_se Xavier
2024-07-04  8:30     ` kernel test robot
2024-06-29 11:28   ` [PATCH-RT sched v2 2/2] RT test: Adding test cases for RT group scheduling Xavier
2024-07-16  6:05   ` [PATCH-RT sched v3 0/2] Optimize the " Xavier
2024-07-16  6:05     ` [PATCH-RT sched v3 1/2] RT SCHED: Optimize the enqueue and dequeue operations for rt_se Xavier
2024-07-16 20:24       ` kernel test robot
2024-07-17  3:00         ` [PATCH-RT sched v4 0/2] Optimize the RT group scheduling Xavier
2024-07-17  3:00           ` [PATCH-RT sched v4 1/2] RT SCHED: Optimize the enqueue and dequeue operations for rt_se Xavier
2024-07-25  6:21             ` Xavier
2024-08-08 11:22               ` Xavier [this message]
2024-07-17  3:00           ` [PATCH-RT sched v4 2/2] RT test: Adding test cases for RT group scheduling Xavier
2024-07-16  6:05     ` [PATCH-RT sched v3 " Xavier
2024-07-29  9:32 ` [PATCH-RT sched v1 0/2] Optimize the " Michal Koutný
2024-07-31  3:02   ` Xavier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=68f44114.90cb.19131b9c26e.Coremail.xavier_qy@163.com \
    --to=xavier_qy@163.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®