From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: "peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"acme@kernel.org" <acme@kernel.org>,
"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com"
<alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
"namhyung@kernel.org" <namhyung@kernel.org>,
"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
"ak@linux.intel.com" <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"suzuki.poulose@arm.com" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
"james.clark@arm.com" <james.clark@arm.com>,
Zhangshaokun <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>,
"robin.murphy@arm.com" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"liuqi (BA)" <liuqi115@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 5/7] perf pmu: Support matching by sysid
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 12:24:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <68f9d5ce-d0a1-f7fa-fd01-e4f613ebad0c@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200212121603.GJ183981@krava>
On 12/02/2020 12:16, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>> et me consider this part for perf test support.
>> I will note that perf test has many issues on my arm64 board:
>>
>> do] password for john:
>> 1: vmlinux symtab matches kallsyms : Skip
>> 2: Detect openat syscall event : FAILED!
>> 3: Detect openat syscall event on all cpus : FAILED!
>> 4: Read samples using the mmap interface : FAILED!
>> 5: Test data source output : Ok
>> 6: Parse event definition strings : FAILED!
>> 7: Simple expression parser : Ok
>> 8: PERF_RECORD_* events & perf_sample fields : Ok
>> 9: Parse perf pmu format : Ok
>> 10: DSO data read : Ok
>> 11: DSO data cache : Ok
>> 12: DSO data reopen : Ok
>> 13: Roundtrip evsel->name : Ok
>> 14: Parse sched tracepoints fields : FAILED!
>> 15: syscalls:sys_enter_openat event fields : FAILED!
> looks like some issue with tracepoints
>
>> 16: Setup struct perf_event_attr : Skip
>> 17: Match and link multiple hists : Ok
>> 18: 'import perf' in python : Ok
>> 21: Breakpoint accounting : Ok
>> 22: Watchpoint :
>> 22.1: Read Only Watchpoint : Ok
>> 22.2: Write Only Watchpoint : Ok
>> 22.3: Read / Write Watchpoint : Ok
>> 22.4: Modify Watchpoint : Ok
>> 23: Number of exit events of a simple workload : Ok
>> 24: Software clock events period values : Ok
>> 25: Object code reading : Ok
>> 26: Sample parsing : Ok
>> 27: Use a dummy software event to keep tracking : Ok
>> 28: Parse with no sample_id_all bit set : Ok
>> 29: Filter hist entries : Ok
>> 30: Lookup mmap thread : Ok
>> 31: Share thread maps : Ok
>> 32: Sort output of hist entries : Ok
>> 33: Cumulate child hist entries : Ok
>> 34: Track with sched_switch : Ok
>> 35: Filter fds with revents mask in a fdarray : Ok
>> 36: Add fd to a fdarray, making it autogrow : Ok
>> 37: kmod_path__parse : Ok
>> 38: Thread map : Ok
>> 39: LLVM search and compile :
>> 39.1: Basic BPF llvm compile : Skip
>> 39.2: kbuild searching : Skip
>> 39.3: Compile source for BPF prologue generation : Skip
>> 39.4: Compile source for BPF relocation : Skip
> Skip is fine;-)
>
>> 40: Session topology : FAILED!
> I'd expect that one to fail if we don't have special
> code to support arm in there
>
>> 41: BPF filter :
>> 41.1: Basic BPF filtering : Skip
>> 41.2: BPF pinning : Skip
>> 41.3: BPF prologue generation : Skip
>> 41.4: BPF relocation checker : Skip
>> 42: Synthesize thread map : Ok
>> 43: Remove thread map : Ok
>> 44: Synthesize cpu map : Ok
>> 45: Synthesize stat config : Ok
>> 46: Synthesize stat : Ok
>> 47: Synthesize stat round : Ok
>> 48: Synthesize attr update : Ok
>> 49: Event times : Ok
>> 50: Read backward ring buffer : FAILED!
> hum, I thought this was generic code that would work across archs
>
>> 51: Print cpu map : Ok
>> 52: Merge cpu map : Ok
>> 53: Probe SDT events : Ok
>> 54: is_printable_array : Ok
>> 55: Print bitmap : Ok
>> 56: perf hooks umber__scnprintf : Ok
>> 59: mem2node : Ok
>> 60: time utils : Ok
>> 61: Test jit_write_elf : Ok
>> 62: maps__merge_in : Ok
>> 63: DWARF unwind : Ok
>> 64: Check open filename arg using perf trace + vfs_getname: FAILED!
>> 65: Add vfs_getname probe to get syscall args filenames : FAILED!
>> 66: Use vfs_getname probe to get syscall args filenames : FAILED!
> with these we have always a problem across archs,
> it's tricky to make script test that works everywhere:-\
>
>> 67: Zstd perf.data compression/decompression : Ok
>> 68: probe libc's inet_pton & backtrace it with ping : Skip
>> john@ubuntu:~/linux$
>>
>> I know that the perf tool definitely has issues for system topology for
>> arm64, which I need to check on.
>>
>> Maybe I can conscribe help internally to help check the rest...
Hi jirka,
> the json/alias test would be also to make sure the x86 still works,
> so regardless of some tests failing on arm, I think it's still better
> to have that test
OK, I can look at this separately now, and it won't be blocked like this
series is on the kernel sysid issue.
Thanks,
john
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-12 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-24 14:34 [PATCH RFC 0/7] perf pmu-events: Support event aliasing for system PMUs John Garry
2020-01-24 14:34 ` [PATCH RFC 1/7] perf jevents: Add support for an extra directory level John Garry
2020-02-10 12:07 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-02-10 15:47 ` John Garry
2020-01-24 14:35 ` [PATCH RFC 2/7] perf vendor events arm64: Relocate hip08 core events John Garry
2020-01-24 14:35 ` [PATCH RFC 3/7] perf jevents: Add support for a system events PMU John Garry
2020-02-10 12:07 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-02-10 12:07 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-02-10 15:55 ` John Garry
2020-02-11 14:46 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-01-24 14:35 ` [PATCH RFC 4/7] perf pmu: Rename uncore symbols to include system PMUs John Garry
2020-02-10 12:07 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-02-10 15:44 ` John Garry
2020-02-11 14:43 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-02-11 15:36 ` John Garry
2020-02-12 12:08 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-01-24 14:35 ` [PATCH RFC 5/7] perf pmu: Support matching by sysid John Garry
2020-02-10 12:07 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-02-10 16:22 ` John Garry
2020-02-11 13:47 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-02-11 15:07 ` John Garry
2020-02-12 10:08 ` John Garry
2020-02-12 12:16 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-02-12 12:24 ` John Garry [this message]
2020-01-24 14:35 ` [PATCH RFC 6/7] perf vendor events arm64: Relocate uncore events for hip08 John Garry
2020-01-24 14:35 ` [PATCH RFC 7/7] perf vendor events arm64: Add hip08 SMMUv3 PMCG IMP DEF events John Garry
2020-02-11 15:24 ` [PATCH RFC 0/7] perf pmu-events: Support event aliasing for system PMUs James Clark
2020-02-11 15:41 ` John Garry
2020-02-18 12:57 ` Will Deacon
2020-02-18 13:24 ` John Garry
2020-02-18 13:39 ` Will Deacon
2020-02-18 16:19 ` John Garry
2020-02-18 17:08 ` Mark Rutland
2020-02-18 17:58 ` John Garry
2020-02-18 18:13 ` Mark Rutland
2020-02-19 1:55 ` Joakim Zhang
2020-02-19 8:44 ` John Garry
2020-02-19 12:40 ` Joakim Zhang
2020-02-19 14:28 ` John Garry
2020-02-19 8:50 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=68f9d5ce-d0a1-f7fa-fd01-e4f613ebad0c@huawei.com \
--to=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=liuqi115@huawei.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome