From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261969AbUEAFIH (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 May 2004 01:08:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261982AbUEAFIH (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 May 2004 01:08:07 -0400 Received: from obsidian.spiritone.com ([216.99.193.137]:59070 "EHLO obsidian.spiritone.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261969AbUEAFIF (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 May 2004 01:08:05 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 22:07:59 -0700 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Marc Boucher cc: "'lkml - Kernel Mailing List'" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license Message-ID: <6900000.1083388078@[10.10.2.4]> In-Reply-To: <90DD8A88-9AE2-11D8-B83D-000A95BCAC26@linuxant.com> References: <009701c42edf$25e47390$ca41cb3f@amer.cisco.com> <90DD8A88-9AE2-11D8-B83D-000A95BCAC26@linuxant.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > All bugs can be debugged or fixed, it's a matter of how hard it is > to do (generally easier with open-source) and *who* is responsible > for doing it (i.e. supporting the modules). Yes, exactly. The tainted mechanism is there to tell us that it's not *our* problem to support it. And you deliberately screwed that up, which is why everybody is pissed at you. M.