From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] x86: bug: prevent gcc distortions
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 10:52:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <691d9a5d264ec9e3b99a291f9da4f890aa52d27d.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B7EA94A4-5AFD-4ED6-BD90-9A5E417FCECB@vmware.com>
On Fri, 2018-05-18 at 14:22 +0000, Nadav Amit wrote:
> It is hard to make the code readable in C, readable in the generated asm,
> and to follow the coding style imposed by checkpatch (e.g., no space between
> the newline and the asm argument before it).
Ignore checkpatch when you know better.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-18 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-17 16:13 [PATCH 0/6] Macrofying inline assembly for better compilation Nadav Amit
2018-05-17 16:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86: objtool: use asm macro for better compiler decisions Nadav Amit
2018-05-17 16:13 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86: bug: prevent gcc distortions Nadav Amit
2018-05-18 7:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-18 8:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-18 10:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-05-18 14:36 ` Nadav Amit
2018-05-18 15:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-05-18 15:46 ` Nadav Amit
2018-05-18 15:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-05-18 16:29 ` Nadav Amit
2018-05-18 17:41 ` Boris Petkov
2018-05-18 14:30 ` Nadav Amit
2018-05-18 14:22 ` Nadav Amit
2018-05-18 17:52 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2018-05-18 16:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-05-18 17:24 ` Nadav Amit
2018-05-18 18:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-05-18 18:33 ` hpa
2018-05-18 18:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-05-18 18:53 ` hpa
2018-05-18 19:02 ` Nadav Amit
2018-05-18 19:05 ` hpa
2018-05-18 19:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-05-18 19:18 ` Nadav Amit
2018-05-18 19:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-05-18 19:22 ` hpa
2018-05-18 19:36 ` Nadav Amit
2018-05-18 19:41 ` hpa
2018-05-17 16:13 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86: alternative: macrofy locks for better inlining Nadav Amit
2018-05-17 16:14 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86: prevent inline distortion by paravirt ops Nadav Amit
2018-05-17 16:14 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86: refcount: prevent gcc distortions Nadav Amit
2018-05-19 4:27 ` kbuild test robot
2018-05-17 16:14 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86: removing unneeded new-lines Nadav Amit
2018-05-18 9:20 ` [PATCH 0/6] Macrofying inline assembly for better compilation David Laight
2018-05-18 14:15 ` Nadav Amit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=691d9a5d264ec9e3b99a291f9da4f890aa52d27d.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®