From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030230AbWECP6j (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 May 2006 11:58:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030231AbWECP6j (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 May 2006 11:58:39 -0400 Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com ([64.233.162.192]:17234 "EHLO nz-out-0102.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030230AbWECP6i convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 May 2006 11:58:38 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=VOmXt9hQId4GjElwSdx4Ufa+pPiT8z4AzNbcXlcoGU287dT2j0lvorKCnONBaavl6DdZEJsvuDWY+CwH/IoZxhC7CTje/ICzi7grJreVTa12Zcu7XfMnPcURPKMHnGz0AvJWSqCRqF/feqJvLOIFDwNsWKjlgaHaNLyS+PNAMQU= Message-ID: <6934efce0605030858k3967489p55ef98a26e71b761@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 08:58:36 -0700 From: "Jared Hulbert" To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel?=" Subject: Re: [RFC] Advanced XIP File System Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060503154700.GD5250@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <6934efce0605021453l31a438c4j7c429e6973ab4546@mail.gmail.com> <20060503130502.GD19537@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <6934efce0605030831h30d7e4e3hb057fd1b3f7791d3@mail.gmail.com> <20060503154700.GD5250@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Correct. It is not a must-fix, but having seperate workspaces for all > the filesystems seems wasteful. Agreed. So we copy the cramfs uncompress routines line for line. That optimization seems like low hanging fruit. To consolidate them how should that be approached? Create fs/uncompress.c? Modify axfs and cramfs to use it?