From: Baochen Qiang <baochen.qiang@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Alexander Wilhelm <alexander.wilhelm@westermo.com>,
Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@kernel.org>
Cc: ath12k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] wifi: ath12k: fix endianness handling for SRNG ring pointer accesses
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 10:44:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6948d3fb-d3aa-47c8-9a40-4ad8e3b72ce7@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260311102416.224621-1-alexander.wilhelm@westermo.com>
On 3/11/2026 6:24 PM, Alexander Wilhelm wrote:
> The SRNG head and tail ring pointers are stored in device memory as
> little-endian values. On big-endian systems, direct dereferencing of these
> pointers leads to incorrect values being read or written, causing ring
> management issues and potentially breaking data flow.
>
> This patch ensures all accesses to SRNG ring pointers use the appropriate
> endianness conversions. This affects both read and write paths for source
> and destination rings, as well as debug output. The changes guarantee
> correct operation on both little- and big-endian architectures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Wilhelm <alexander.wilhelm@westermo.com>
> Reviewed-by: Baochen Qiang <baochen.qiang@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - Rebase on latest 'ath' master
> - Remove volatile from `hp_addr` due to the `checkpatch.pl` warning
by 'cgeckpatch.pl wanring' did you mean below ?
"
WARNING: Use of volatile is usually wrong: see
Documentation/process/volatile-considered-harmful.rst
#64: FILE: drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/hal.c:504:
+ *(volatile __le32 *)srng->u.src_ring.tp_addr);
"
But the documentation clearly says that the case here is one of a few rare situations
where volatile makes sense:
"
- Pointers to data structures in coherent memory which might be modified
by I/O devices can, sometimes, legitimately be volatile. A ring buffer
used by a network adapter, where that adapter changes pointers to
indicate which descriptors have been processed, is an example of this
type of situation.
"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-13 2:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-11 10:24 Alexander Wilhelm
2026-03-13 2:44 ` Baochen Qiang [this message]
2026-03-13 6:45 ` Alexander Wilhelm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6948d3fb-d3aa-47c8-9a40-4ad8e3b72ce7@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=baochen.qiang@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=alexander.wilhelm@westermo.com \
--cc=ath12k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=jjohnson@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®