Re: [PATCH v9 -next 08/12] arm64: dts: bcm2712: Add external clock for RP1 chipset on Rpi5

[Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>]

On 5/26/25 07:06, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12/05/2025 18:42, Andrea della Porta wrote:
>> Hi Florian,
>>
>> On 15:02 Mon 12 May     , Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On May 7, 2025 5:01:05 PM GMT+02:00, Andrea della Porta 
>>> <andrea.porta@suse.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Florian, to accept the patches, what would work best for you?
>>>>
>>>> 1) Send only the relevant updated patches (maybe as an entirely new
>>>> patchset with
>>>>    only those specific patches)
>>>
>>> Only the updated patches work for me. I don't think there is that 
>>> much coupling between the DT changes and the non-DT changes (other 
>>> than without DT entries nothing is activated)
>>
>> It's a little bit more involved than that:
>>
>> - Patch 7 (misc driver) depends on 6 (RP1 common dts) which in turn
>>    depends on 1 (clock binding header). Should be taken by Greg.
> 
> Greg gave an Acked-by so I think Florian is good to take that patch. 
> Which leaves us to the clock patches (driver + dt-bindings).
> 
>>
>> - Patch 9 and 10 (board dts) depends on 6 (RP1 common dts) which again
>>    depends on 1 (clock binding header). Should be taken by Florian.
>>
>> - Patch 4 (clock driver) depends on 1 (clock binding header) and
>>    should be taken by Stephen.
>>
> 
> Steven reviewed the patches (driver + dt-binding) so he is waiting for a 
> new version which addresses the review. He offered to either take them 
> and provide a branch that Florian can merge into his branch or provide a 
> Acked-by tag.
> 
> @Florian what would you prefer?

I am fine either way, it's definitively simpler if I can take all of the 
patches in the respective Broadcom ARM SoC branches, but pulling a 
branch from another maintainer's tree works just as well.

Andrea, sorry to ask you this, can you post a v10 and we aim to get that 
version applied?

Thanks!
-- 
Florian