From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754728Ab0JCTWv (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Oct 2010 15:22:51 -0400 Received: from n1-vm1.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com ([67.195.23.153]:44737 "HELO n1-vm1.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754020Ab0JCTWt convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Oct 2010 15:22:49 -0400 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 843717.66725.bm@omp118.mail.gq1.yahoo.com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=KEUQgLn9lFO/XKlTsCYfoUn/KZ+pBqynT3tqDdRTYtqHxHwPJMrOQacEA9iOnbIs2rtQujYqFtEW738zJM8+V+hqoT9OYI054ZNKWeLt99o2vk9yTA/fSELaQ2nKd2zdfZShe/TRAkC/td7Js02X/yqwVdjRrN7PgYPh5ysKCMs=; Message-ID: <695950.71255.qm@web180315.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: mbntKLUVM1mJAiO1mGsITXg1KAixWKhbwoFJqb6gG1NW9nk _8m84_xhHOHGoHh8ux.hjH4zVzSEMUEdBb9oEScN8ZMozxryg7Z4DLD2kJ4J Ke2QjKF9YwcyZDzTXd5pgz_09Mx6Y46_0rNCvrQqE0nDQuTxD0d6Wj0GH84c YqkuJWy.fFSlKYlNrV25g5CZjhcApkrNYtjRt6tB7iJ2TGxXNaRCxv5sIdHy zzB_xqVr9M1T2t6PnKUaJeSAwO8E8GjCpqi7hrT_nl_aGPh7WmREuKcJjk7l ztmMGboQs8wDdCgQYwvOMt7vxHNK5Vp3eL_f1IGARysB4IoArJRrbXA-- X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.9 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 12:22:47 -0700 (PDT) From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] Add usb_endpoint_descriptor to be part of the struct usb_ep To: tlinder , Alan Stern Cc: USB list , Tatyana Linder , David Brownell , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Michal Nazarewicz , Andrew Morton , Kernel development list In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --- On Sun, 10/3/10, Alan Stern wrote: > > Speaking for myself only, ... and me too, for that matter. I don't think people should add > their own > copyright notices in files to which they have not made > substantial > changes.  A little code motion and a small API > adjustment don't seem > like large enough changes to justify this.  Some of > the other files in > this patch have even smaller changes! It's pretty routine that very small patches get merged without attribution, for that matter, beyond GIT history. - Dave >