mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: syzbot <syzbot+2cecf0e829ae2219d419@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Forwarded: Private message regarding: [syzbot] [wireless?] WARNING in drv_get_tsf (2)
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 15:26:43 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <696d6c33.050a0220.3390f1.0030.GAE@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <696d4ffd.050a0220.3390f1.0024.GAE@google.com>

For archival purposes, forwarding an incoming command email to
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com.

***

Subject: Private message regarding: [syzbot] [wireless?] WARNING in drv_get_tsf (2)
Author: kapoorarnav43@gmail.com

#syz test

From e0dd0088f4b871d8c44d5b9ba17dd9eba1f770a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arnav Kapoor <kapoorarnav43@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 04:48:19 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack: add entry limit and cond_resched 
in
 gc_worker

Further limit the gc_worker to process at most 100 entries per bucket
and add cond_resched() at the start of each entry processing to ensure
frequent yielding and prevent RCU stalls.

Reported-by: syzbot+8bb3e2bee8a429cc76dd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=8bb3e2bee8a429cc76dd
---
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c 
b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index 8a2cdd172..ff901a2b4 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -1552,13 +1552,17 @@ static void gc_worker(struct work_struct *work)
                        break;
                }
 
+                int entry_count = 0;
                hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_rcu(h, n, &ct_hash[i], hnnode) {
                        struct nf_conntrack_net *cnet;
                        struct net *net;
                        long expires;
 
                        tmp = nf_ct_tuplehash_to_ctrack(h);
+                        entry_count++;
 
+                        if (entry_count > 100) break;
+                        cond_resched();
                        if (expired_count > GC_SCAN_EXPIRED_MAX) {
                                rcu_read_unlock();
 
-- 
2.43.0From e0dd0088f4b871d8c44d5b9ba17dd9eba1f770a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arnav Kapoor <kapoorarnav43@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 04:48:19 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack: add entry limit and cond_resched 
in
 gc_worker

Further limit the gc_worker to process at most 100 entries per bucket
and add cond_resched() at the start of each entry processing to ensure
frequent yielding and prevent RCU stalls.

Reported-by: syzbot+8bb3e2bee8a429cc76dd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=8bb3e2bee8a429cc76dd
---
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c 
b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index 8a2cdd172..ff901a2b4 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -1552,13 +1552,17 @@ static void gc_worker(struct work_struct *work)
                        break;
                }
 
+                int entry_count = 0;
                hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_rcu(h, n, &ct_hash[i], hnnode) {
                        struct nf_conntrack_net *cnet;
                        struct net *net;
                        long expires;
 
                        tmp = nf_ct_tuplehash_to_ctrack(h);
+                        entry_count++;
 
+                        if (entry_count > 100) break;
+                        cond_resched();
                        if (expired_count > GC_SCAN_EXPIRED_MAX) {
                                rcu_read_unlock();
 
-- 
2.43.0From e0dd0088f4b871d8c44d5b9ba17dd9eba1f770a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arnav Kapoor <kapoorarnav43@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 04:48:19 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack: add entry limit and cond_resched 
in
 gc_worker

Further limit the gc_worker to process at most 100 entries per bucket
and add cond_resched() at the start of each entry processing to ensure
frequent yielding and prevent RCU stalls.

Reported-by: syzbot+8bb3e2bee8a429cc76dd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=8bb3e2bee8a429cc76dd
---
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c 
b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index 8a2cdd172..ff901a2b4 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -1552,13 +1552,17 @@ static void gc_worker(struct work_struct *work)
                        break;
                }
 
+                int entry_count = 0;
                hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_rcu(h, n, &ct_hash[i], hnnode) {
                        struct nf_conntrack_net *cnet;
                        struct net *net;
                        long expires;
 
                        tmp = nf_ct_tuplehash_to_ctrack(h);
+                        entry_count++;
 
+                        if (entry_count > 100) break;
+                        cond_resched();
                        if (expired_count > GC_SCAN_EXPIRED_MAX) {
                                rcu_read_unlock();
 
-- 
2.43.0From e0dd0088f4b871d8c44d5b9ba17dd9eba1f770a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arnav Kapoor <kapoorarnav43@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 04:48:19 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack: add entry limit and cond_resched 
in
 gc_worker

Further limit the gc_worker to process at most 100 entries per bucket
and add cond_resched() at the start of each entry processing to ensure
frequent yielding and prevent RCU stalls.

Reported-by: syzbot+8bb3e2bee8a429cc76dd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=8bb3e2bee8a429cc76dd
---
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c 
b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index 8a2cdd172..ff901a2b4 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -1552,13 +1552,17 @@ static void gc_worker(struct work_struct *work)
                        break;
                }
 
+                int entry_count = 0;
                hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_rcu(h, n, &ct_hash[i], hnnode) {
                        struct nf_conntrack_net *cnet;
                        struct net *net;
                        long expires;
 
                        tmp = nf_ct_tuplehash_to_ctrack(h);
+                        entry_count++;
 
+                        if (entry_count > 100) break;
+                        cond_resched();
                        if (expired_count > GC_SCAN_EXPIRED_MAX) {
                                rcu_read_unlock();
 
-- 
2.43.0From e0dd0088f4b871d8c44d5b9ba17dd9eba1f770a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arnav Kapoor <kapoorarnav43@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 04:48:19 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack: add entry limit and cond_resched 
in
 gc_worker

Further limit the gc_worker to process at most 100 entries per bucket
and add cond_resched() at the start of each entry processing to ensure
frequent yielding and prevent RCU stalls.

Reported-by: syzbot+8bb3e2bee8a429cc76dd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=8bb3e2bee8a429cc76dd
---
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c 
b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index 8a2cdd172..ff901a2b4 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -1552,13 +1552,17 @@ static void gc_worker(struct work_struct *work)
                        break;
                }
 
+                int entry_count = 0;
                hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_rcu(h, n, &ct_hash[i], hnnode) {
                        struct nf_conntrack_net *cnet;
                        struct net *net;
                        long expires;
 
                        tmp = nf_ct_tuplehash_to_ctrack(h);
+                        entry_count++;
 
+                        if (entry_count > 100) break;
+                        cond_resched();
                        if (expired_count > GC_SCAN_EXPIRED_MAX) {
                                rcu_read_unlock();
 
-- 
2.43.0

On Monday, 19 January 2026 at 04:50:05 UTC+5:30 syzbot wrote:

Hello, 

syzbot tried to test the proposed patch but the build/boot failed: 

net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c:662:70: error: expected ')' before 'return' 
net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c:665:1: error: expected expression before '}' 
token 
net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c:664:80: error: expected ';' before '}' token 
net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c:665:1: error: no return statement in function 
returning non-void [-Werror=return-type] 


Tested on: 

commit: e84d9601 Merge tag 'for-6.19-rc5-tag' of git://git.ker.. 
git tree: upstream 
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=ae589cd0a6acd9be 
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2cecf0e829ae2219d419 
compiler: gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14+deb12u1) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for 
Debian) 2.40 
patch: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/patch.diff?x=100fdb9a580000 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-18 23:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-18 21:26 syzbot
2026-01-18 21:37 ` Forwarded: Private message regarding: " syzbot
2026-01-18 21:59 ` syzbot
2026-01-18 22:25 ` syzbot
2026-01-18 22:38 ` syzbot
2026-01-18 22:52 ` syzbot
2026-01-18 23:10 ` syzbot
2026-01-18 23:26 ` syzbot [this message]
2026-01-18 23:29 ` syzbot
2026-01-18 23:51 ` syzbot
2026-01-18 23:55 ` Forwarded: Private message regarding: " syzbot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=696d6c33.050a0220.3390f1.0030.GAE@google.com \
    --to=syzbot+2cecf0e829ae2219d419@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®