mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leo Martins <loemra.dev@gmail.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>,
	Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: abort transaction before releasing tree_log_mutex on commit failure
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 17:40:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <698c480ec13cd6e74c2175924f614b7e324e6cc3.1787099421.git.loemra.dev@gmail.com> (raw)

When transaction metadata writeout fails in btrfs_commit_transaction(),
the current code only logs the error, drops tree_log_mutex and then goes
through cleanup_transaction(), which aborts the transaction and records
the fs error.

That is too late for the tree log side. A log sync can already be
waiting on tree_log_mutex, because the committing transaction is moved
to TRANS_STATE_UNBLOCKED while that mutex is held, which lets fsyncs
join the next transaction and queue up in btrfs_sync_log(). Once the
failed commit drops tree_log_mutex, such a log sync acquires it, sees
BTRFS_FS_ERROR() still clear, and writes super_for_commit. That
superblock holds the roots prepared for the transaction that has just
failed to write out its metadata, so it can point at tree blocks that
never reached the disk, and the next mount fails with a parent transid
mismatch.

Commit 165ea85f1483 ("btrfs: do not write supers if we have an fs
error") fixed this class of problem by making btrfs_sync_log() check for
an fs error right after taking tree_log_mutex. That check only works if
the commit path publishes the fs error before it releases the same
mutex, and commit 68d4ece9c30e ("btrfs: don't call
btrfs_handle_fs_error() in btrfs_commit_transaction()") removed the only
thing that did so.

Restore the ordering by aborting the transaction while tree_log_mutex is
still held. We have a transaction handle here, so this does not need to
bring back the btrfs_handle_fs_error() call: __btrfs_abort_transaction()
records the fs error itself, which is all btrfs_sync_log() looks at, and
the error message put in its place is kept.

This is what commit 3810ab40afa5 ("btrfs: abort transaction on error in
write_all_supers()") already does for the next call in this function.

This is reproducible on an unmodified kernel by failing the first
couple of bios of a transaction commit with fail_make_request while a
concurrent fsync workload keeps log syncs queued on tree_log_mutex.

Fixes: 68d4ece9c30e ("btrfs: don't call btrfs_handle_fs_error() in btrfs_commit_transaction()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 7.0+
Signed-off-by: Leo Martins <loemra.dev@gmail.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
index 13a7e5f4e08c..ed850bf0546a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
@@ -2583,6 +2583,12 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
 	ret = btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction(trans);
 	if (unlikely(ret)) {
 		btrfs_err(fs_info, "error while writing out transaction: %pe", ERR_PTR(ret));
+		/*
+		 * Abort before releasing tree_log_mutex, so a log sync waiting
+		 * on it sees the fs error and skips writing super_for_commit
+		 * for this failed transaction. See btrfs_sync_log().
+		 */
+		btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
 		mutex_unlock(&fs_info->tree_log_mutex);
 		goto scrub_continue;
 	}
-- 
2.53.0-Meta


             reply	other threads:[~2026-08-19  0:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-19  0:40 Leo Martins [this message]
2026-08-19 20:27 ` Boris Burkov
2026-08-20 11:25 ` jlayton
2026-08-25 12:37 ` Filipe Manana

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=698c480ec13cd6e74c2175924f614b7e324e6cc3.1787099421.git.loemra.dev@gmail.com \
    --to=loemra.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
    --cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®