mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Karunika Choo <karunika.choo@arm.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nd@arm.com,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/panthor: Add 64-bit and poll register accessors
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 16:17:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6994d307-17e7-453b-b5b9-99a422f73f66@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250410184637.5e0613d2@collabora.com>

On 10/04/2025 17:46, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 17:35:46 +0100
> Karunika Choo <karunika.choo@arm.com> wrote:
> 
>> This patch adds 64-bit register accessors to simplify register access in
>> Panthor. It also adds 32-bit and 64-bit variants for read_poll_timeout.
>>
>> This patch also updates Panthor to use the new 64-bit accessors and poll
>> functions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Karunika Choo <karunika.choo@arm.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h |  71 ++++++++++++
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_fw.c     |   9 +-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gpu.c    | 142 ++++++-----------------
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c    |  34 ++----
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_regs.h   |   6 -
>>  5 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h
>> index da6574021664..5028e25f5e0d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h
>> @@ -428,4 +428,75 @@ static int panthor_request_ ## __name ## _irq(struct panthor_device *ptdev,			\
>>  
>>  extern struct workqueue_struct *panthor_cleanup_wq;
>>  
>> +static inline void gpu_write(struct panthor_device *ptdev, u32 reg, u32 data)
>> +{
>> +	writel(data, ptdev->iomem + reg);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline u32 gpu_read(struct panthor_device *ptdev, u32 reg)
>> +{
>> +	return readl(ptdev->iomem + reg);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline u32 gpu_read_relaxed(struct panthor_device *ptdev, u32 reg)
>> +{
>> +	return readl_relaxed(ptdev->iomem + reg);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void gpu_write64(struct panthor_device *ptdev, u32 reg, u64 data)
>> +{
>> +	gpu_write(ptdev, reg, lower_32_bits(data));
>> +	gpu_write(ptdev, reg + 4, upper_32_bits(data));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline u64 gpu_read64(struct panthor_device *ptdev, u32 reg)
>> +{
>> +	return (gpu_read(ptdev, reg) | ((u64)gpu_read(ptdev, reg + 4) << 32));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline u64 gpu_read64_relaxed(struct panthor_device *ptdev, u32 reg)
>> +{
>> +	return (gpu_read_relaxed(ptdev, reg) |
>> +		((u64)gpu_read_relaxed(ptdev, reg + 4) << 32));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline u64 gpu_read64_counter(struct panthor_device *ptdev, u32 reg)
>> +{
>> +	u32 lo, hi1, hi2;
>> +	do {
>> +		hi1 = gpu_read(ptdev, reg + 4);
>> +		lo = gpu_read(ptdev, reg);
>> +		hi2 = gpu_read(ptdev, reg + 4);
>> +	} while (hi1 != hi2);
>> +	return lo | ((u64)hi2 << 32);
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define gpu_read_poll_timeout(dev, reg, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us)    \
>> +	read_poll_timeout(gpu_read, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us, false, \
>> +			  dev, reg)
> 
> nit: can use use tabs to pad till the '\' at the end of the line so we
> can have a consistent formatting across these definitions?
> 
>> +
>> +#define gpu_read_poll_timeout_atomic(dev, reg, val, cond, delay_us,         \
>> +				     timeout_us)                            \
>> +	read_poll_timeout_atomic(gpu_read, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us, \
>> +				 false, dev, reg)
>> +
>> +#define gpu_read64_poll_timeout(dev, reg, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us)    \
>> +	read_poll_timeout(gpu_read64, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us, false, \
>> +			  dev, reg)
>> +
>> +#define gpu_read64_poll_timeout_atomic(dev, reg, val, cond, delay_us,         \
>> +				       timeout_us)                            \
>> +	read_poll_timeout_atomic(gpu_read64, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us, \
>> +				 false, dev, reg)
>> +
>> +#define gpu_read_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(dev, reg, val, cond, delay_us, \
>> +					     timeout_us)                    \
>> +	read_poll_timeout_atomic(gpu_read_relaxed, val, cond, delay_us,     \
>> +				 timeout_us, false, dev, reg)
>> +
>> +#define gpu_read64_relaxed_poll_timeout(dev, reg, val, cond, delay_us,         \
>> +					timeout_us)                            \
>> +	read_poll_timeout(gpu_read64_relaxed, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us, \
>> +			  false, dev, reg)
>> +
>>  #endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_fw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_fw.c
>> index 0f52766a3120..ecfbe0456f89 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_fw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_fw.c
>> @@ -1059,8 +1059,8 @@ static void panthor_fw_stop(struct panthor_device *ptdev)
>>  	u32 status;
>>  
>>  	gpu_write(ptdev, MCU_CONTROL, MCU_CONTROL_DISABLE);
>> -	if (readl_poll_timeout(ptdev->iomem + MCU_STATUS, status,
>> -			       status == MCU_STATUS_DISABLED, 10, 100000))
>> +	if (gpu_read_poll_timeout(ptdev, MCU_STATUS, status,
>> +				  status == MCU_STATUS_DISABLED, 10, 100000))
>>  		drm_err(&ptdev->base, "Failed to stop MCU");
>>  }
>>  
>> @@ -1085,8 +1085,9 @@ void panthor_fw_pre_reset(struct panthor_device *ptdev, bool on_hang)
>>  
>>  		panthor_fw_update_reqs(glb_iface, req, GLB_HALT, GLB_HALT);
>>  		gpu_write(ptdev, CSF_DOORBELL(CSF_GLB_DOORBELL_ID), 1);
>> -		if (!readl_poll_timeout(ptdev->iomem + MCU_STATUS, status,
>> -					status == MCU_STATUS_HALT, 10, 100000)) {
>> +		if (!gpu_read_poll_timeout(ptdev, MCU_STATUS, status,
>> +					   status == MCU_STATUS_HALT, 10,
>> +					   100000)) {
>>  			ptdev->reset.fast = true;
>>  		} else {
>>  			drm_warn(&ptdev->base, "Failed to cleanly suspend MCU");
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gpu.c
>> index 671049020afa..fd09f0928019 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gpu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gpu.c
>> @@ -108,14 +108,9 @@ static void panthor_gpu_init_info(struct panthor_device *ptdev)
>>  
>>  	ptdev->gpu_info.as_present = gpu_read(ptdev, GPU_AS_PRESENT);
>>  
>> -	ptdev->gpu_info.shader_present = gpu_read(ptdev, GPU_SHADER_PRESENT_LO);
>> -	ptdev->gpu_info.shader_present |= (u64)gpu_read(ptdev, GPU_SHADER_PRESENT_HI) << 32;
>> -
>> -	ptdev->gpu_info.tiler_present = gpu_read(ptdev, GPU_TILER_PRESENT_LO);
>> -	ptdev->gpu_info.tiler_present |= (u64)gpu_read(ptdev, GPU_TILER_PRESENT_HI) << 32;
>> -
>> -	ptdev->gpu_info.l2_present = gpu_read(ptdev, GPU_L2_PRESENT_LO);
>> -	ptdev->gpu_info.l2_present |= (u64)gpu_read(ptdev, GPU_L2_PRESENT_HI) << 32;
>> +	ptdev->gpu_info.shader_present = gpu_read64(ptdev, GPU_SHADER_PRESENT_LO);
>> +	ptdev->gpu_info.tiler_present = gpu_read64(ptdev, GPU_TILER_PRESENT_LO);
>> +	ptdev->gpu_info.l2_present = gpu_read64(ptdev, GPU_L2_PRESENT_LO);
> 
> Now that we have proper 64-bit accessors, I think I would drop the
> _LO/_HI definitions and just go a single def per register that replaces
> the _LO one.

Hello, 

please find a link to v2 below that addresses your comments.

- https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20250411151140.1815435-1-karunika.choo@arm.com/

Kind regards,
Karunika Choo


  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-11 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-10 16:35 Karunika Choo
2025-04-10 16:46 ` Boris Brezillon
2025-04-11 15:17   ` Karunika Choo [this message]
2025-04-11 15:25     ` Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6994d307-17e7-453b-b5b9-99a422f73f66@arm.com \
    --to=karunika.choo@arm.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®