mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: syzbot <syzbot+0b6ec149bb8b98bd9485@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	 syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, tglx@kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: [syzbot] [kernel?] possible deadlock in worker_thread (3)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2026 08:41:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <69988ebc.a70a0220.2c38d7.0142.GAE@google.com> (raw)

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    635c467cc14e Add linux-next specific files for 20260213
git tree:       linux-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=15339b3a580000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=61690c38d1398936
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=0b6ec149bb8b98bd9485
compiler:       Debian clang version 21.1.8 (++20251221033036+2078da43e25a-1~exp1~20251221153213.50), Debian LLD 21.1.8

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/78b3d15ca8e6/disk-635c467c.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/a95f3d108ef4/vmlinux-635c467c.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/e58086838b24/bzImage-635c467c.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+0b6ec149bb8b98bd9485@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

block nbd1: Receive control failed (result -32)
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/u9:3/5827 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880275b9a78 (&nbd->config_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock+0x30/0xa0 lib/refcount.c:118

but task is already holding lock:
ffffc90003bd7c40 ((work_completion)(&args->work)#3){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x87c/0x1650 kernel/workqueue.c:3255

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #2 ((work_completion)(&args->work)#3){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       process_one_work+0x895/0x1650 kernel/workqueue.c:3255
       process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3362 [inline]
       worker_thread+0xb46/0x1140 kernel/workqueue.c:3443
       kthread+0x388/0x470 kernel/kthread.c:467
       ret_from_fork+0x51e/0xb90 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158
       ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245

-> #1 ((wq_completion)nbd3-recv){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       touch_wq_lockdep_map+0xcb/0x180 kernel/workqueue.c:3994
       __flush_workqueue+0x14b/0x14f0 kernel/workqueue.c:4036
       nbd_disconnect_and_put+0x9e/0x2c0 drivers/block/nbd.c:2264
       nbd_genl_disconnect+0x4a9/0x590 drivers/block/nbd.c:2303
       genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x22a/0x330 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1115
       genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:1195 [inline]
       genl_rcv_msg+0x61c/0x7a0 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1210
       netlink_rcv_skb+0x232/0x4b0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2550
       genl_rcv+0x28/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1219
       netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1318 [inline]
       netlink_unicast+0x80f/0x9b0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1344
       netlink_sendmsg+0x813/0xb40 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1894
       sock_sendmsg_nosec+0x18f/0x1d0 net/socket.c:737
       __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:752 [inline]
       ____sys_sendmsg+0x589/0x8c0 net/socket.c:2610
       ___sys_sendmsg+0x2a5/0x360 net/socket.c:2664
       __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2696 [inline]
       __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2701 [inline]
       __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2699 [inline]
       __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x1bd/0x2a0 net/socket.c:2699
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x14d/0xf80 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #0 (&nbd->config_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3165 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3284 [inline]
       validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3908 [inline]
       __lock_acquire+0x15a5/0x2cf0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5237
       lock_acquire+0xf0/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:614 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x19f/0x1300 kernel/locking/mutex.c:776
       refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock+0x30/0xa0 lib/refcount.c:118
       nbd_config_put+0x2c/0x580 drivers/block/nbd.c:1434
       recv_work+0x1cc1/0x1d90 drivers/block/nbd.c:1026
       process_one_work+0x949/0x1650 kernel/workqueue.c:3279
       process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3362 [inline]
       worker_thread+0xb46/0x1140 kernel/workqueue.c:3443
       kthread+0x388/0x470 kernel/kthread.c:467
       ret_from_fork+0x51e/0xb90 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158
       ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  &nbd->config_lock --> (wq_completion)nbd3-recv --> (work_completion)(&args->work)#3

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock((work_completion)(&args->work)#3);
                               lock((wq_completion)nbd3-recv);
                               lock((work_completion)(&args->work)#3);
  lock(&nbd->config_lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

2 locks held by kworker/u9:3/5827:
 #0: ffff8880275c9148 ((wq_completion)nbd1-recv){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x855/0x1650 kernel/workqueue.c:3254
 #1: ffffc90003bd7c40 ((work_completion)(&args->work)#3){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x87c/0x1650 kernel/workqueue.c:3255

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5827 Comm: kworker/u9:3 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) 
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/12/2026
Workqueue: nbd1-recv recv_work
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0xe8/0x150 lib/dump_stack.c:120
 print_circular_bug+0x2e1/0x300 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2043
 check_noncircular+0x12e/0x150 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2175
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3165 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3284 [inline]
 validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3908 [inline]
 __lock_acquire+0x15a5/0x2cf0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5237
 lock_acquire+0xf0/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868
 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:614 [inline]
 __mutex_lock+0x19f/0x1300 kernel/locking/mutex.c:776
 refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock+0x30/0xa0 lib/refcount.c:118
 nbd_config_put+0x2c/0x580 drivers/block/nbd.c:1434
 recv_work+0x1cc1/0x1d90 drivers/block/nbd.c:1026
 process_one_work+0x949/0x1650 kernel/workqueue.c:3279
 process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3362 [inline]
 worker_thread+0xb46/0x1140 kernel/workqueue.c:3443
 kthread+0x388/0x470 kernel/kthread.c:467
 ret_from_fork+0x51e/0xb90 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158
 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
 </TASK>
block nbd1: shutting down sockets


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

             reply	other threads:[~2026-02-20 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-20 16:41 syzbot [this message]
2026-02-22 21:46 ` [syzbot] [kernel?^W NDB] " Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=69988ebc.a70a0220.2c38d7.0142.GAE@google.com \
    --to=syzbot+0b6ec149bb8b98bd9485@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome