From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [168.119.38.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B247419C569; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 23:14:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743030885; cv=none; b=PfajpzEE6v2NbpqOm31jpN943o+ApTPY/k2OLVfSbPujsI5Ovs0nKfBgsuC28paat0xgs/PJ1E6yyUFRakJyCuToqgTENUuNNzaf/LPjHbvSZVByjFDRnltViLKV0vmeAkgKrAHCou66lb0supL6njCK4/za+t4kffPXjSxreGY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743030885; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NRxhzX97zbLNqsKqNz31eZbURDBwCrCNRXlfK0yFU6I=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=X07cbKcRkgNXZ4Z+hTVCUWUSKHIIv7CRyns7+V7attsWVq4nXyhyggwMJkLSIj9PdMf8shaxXt/AZw4LdNzuSjil5sYe8yVLtzrA5dyH2dkFIGbB3e1rErmxjFA92nbLln4WJ/VSbL02sGMdEqg5g6TDXJd0+k46GPVLA6bvIBU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b=x/EEL1ja; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b="x/EEL1ja" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=NRxhzX97zbLNqsKqNz31eZbURDBwCrCNRXlfK0yFU6I=; t=1743030883; x=1744240483; b=x/EEL1ja1n0FpYr0sDGlWFxeEgs7/QwJVuDntw0gzrfhavm mb5qlkdKrYgxZ+Weo3yTMSmBLwUVe606Nnpo1KULQAIw7pAau46NulauJfYGjOZ/qMoHD+n60SVn+ Z5N0hhO13cVWFlGy78HdVLDcEeX+FfKc+rIseP9l4ftFl8SoPTh2OixyT33BBqqmBc5+H/ntLJ7++ 8hBeKlf/89k0AnMkBHc+JO58m1CbSObjQpHIGgSltZBA/LGfqzzPpTC/TIr3zr0snviokudTAynh2 /2mhiMK/OfzVxFnxduw+FI62EC7I1xexuhuwuqdFLpky39MO9pHzK+Dvyl3Zfa2Q==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1txZx1-00000006USq-3r9X; Thu, 27 Mar 2025 00:14:24 +0100 Message-ID: <69bd300d79f7f6317a964030930252b307b85007.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] dt-bindings: net: Add network-class.yaml schema From: Johannes Berg To: David Heidelberg , Rob Herring Cc: Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Mailing List , Lorenzo Bianconi , van Spriel , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=F4me?= Pouiller , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Andy Gross , Mailing List , netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Janne Grunau Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 00:14:19 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4B465FA3-E6B5-4EB1-A712-0C8874402FCE@ixit.cz> References: <20250324-dt-bindings-network-class-v5-0-f5c3fe00e8f0@ixit.cz> <3452b67752228665fa275030a7d8100b73063392.camel@sipsolutions.net> <4B465FA3-E6B5-4EB1-A712-0C8874402FCE@ixit.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.54.3 (3.54.3-1.fc41) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned On Wed, 2025-03-26 at 23:08 +0000, David Heidelberg wrote: > > I can do that, but I suppose it's 6.16 material at this point. >=20 > Hi Johannes.=20 >=20 > I assume you meant 6.15?=20 No. 6.15 merge window just opened. > This patchset should mainly clarify where these properties can be used an= d address incorrect warnings regarding device-tree verification.=20 I'm not really convinced that makes it a bugfix for the rc series though? johannes