From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753283AbaCAVR4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Mar 2014 16:17:56 -0500 Received: from cock.li ([75.102.27.230]:43481 "EHLO cock.li" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753191AbaCAVRz (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Mar 2014 16:17:55 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 327 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 16:17:55 EST MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 21:12:25 +0000 From: disbandtechctte@tfwno.gf To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Four people decided the fate of debian with systemd. Bad faith likely Message-ID: <69ed98c91cff21f26f34b8b1c373b6d3@tfwno.gf> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9.5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org FOUR people made a decision that would once have required thousands of votes. FOUR votes overrideds the decision debian took before the tech-ctte dictatorship to standardize on system V init rather than bsd style init scripts The tech-ctte was created to arbitrate and decide disputes between package maintainers. It was not created to decide fundamental issues about the OS. Some members have used it in bad faith to push through a decision This is a bad-faith aquisition of power here that has occured. The debian tech-ctte should be disbanded for that reason *The tech-ctte is stacked not with volunteer debian devs, but by people on the payroll of redhat and canonical of ubuntu fame, that's why there was a tie-vote, they voted their paycheques *The monetary situation with the tech-ctte members raises a strong presumption of self-dealing. *The way they voted party lines confirms it nearly.