From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gentwo.org (gentwo.org [62.72.0.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0819E1F669E for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 16:38:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.72.0.81 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729010340; cv=none; b=K2oWCXRhPK/q3GNOym/9QYvz8eW1GJKOnFXwvawadtJ/+v6JgUCZHGxpWvzNHFM0KfCf1/Zs9V+asV+W/EoKPVEr/9o24t4yfjjgZI+3E7IXekvZUfeT62Tl12YQMxfjrLAsH0Mio6QD5DLXrbqo8Lx10/pKU/Ny9Urehjlbf3o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729010340; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KMikBMy8/yloqBJTB1hmGDuQC8oMLXDUVmZdazDCRrY=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=NDR+vK5zmUE71n9VEpArW49R/D3LahwlJrNp+OaM+yEFeY8asiXLOLJvBtvc8+Bh59QSzoY/3bDGNZaeaoCAPRM9SxwVLnKQgnixLT64BJXvUSPy3BhARPuDMAC0ylU7BY1rHOt2OSxIiI7unlHqDuaFxt1TSPOJeC+H4S120SQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=gentwo.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gentwo.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gentwo.org header.i=@gentwo.org header.b=dqWyFRBD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.72.0.81 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=gentwo.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gentwo.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gentwo.org header.i=@gentwo.org header.b="dqWyFRBD" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gentwo.org; s=default; t=1729010338; bh=KMikBMy8/yloqBJTB1hmGDuQC8oMLXDUVmZdazDCRrY=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=dqWyFRBDMaY7k9uIAnfduQ0OasJcHWuzfrcHzgXP89xCbT/axPPv1VmPF8jbpXnnN HrYybrKB86Lu+KLurfN7uNLf3mzFQ9i51CLRb3qL7DuZ55DukBCQDw8N/x66leMVJf iMkgmab3FLpQpLOTmb/E8ymAAWORl5K4IoNw6SAE= Received: by gentwo.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 03B5A401D1; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:38:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gentwo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 013FD400C9; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:38:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:38:57 -0700 (PDT) From: "Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" To: Vlastimil Babka cc: David Rientjes , "yuan.gao" , penberg@kernel.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, 42.hyeyoo@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm/slub: Avoid list corruption when removing a slab from the full list In-Reply-To: <81fc4d8e-fb9f-4e7e-bbb9-dd3f53123398@suse.cz> Message-ID: <69f719ab-8251-e6c1-5c10-0f89fc6413b9@gentwo.org> References: <20241011102020.58087-1-yuan.gao@ucloud.cn> <572f7473-1781-388b-103e-d4382f58f2f9@google.com> <7726cccb-78f8-4696-ac7e-57598c35576d@suse.cz> <81fc4d8e-fb9f-4e7e-bbb9-dd3f53123398@suse.cz> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Tue, 15 Oct 2024, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 10/14/24 18:47, Christoph Lameter (Ampere) wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Oct 2024, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > > >> What about: > >> > >> "Slab disabled due to previous consistency check failure" ? > > > > I think this implies more than we can actually check. We can only check > > the metadata generated by SLUB. The consistency check for the object > > itself does not exist and would have to be done by the subsystem. > > "Slab disabled since SLUB metadata consistency check failure" ? "failed" Sounds good.