From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from canpmsgout08.his.huawei.com (canpmsgout08.his.huawei.com [113.46.200.223]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE7EE381E92; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 04:13:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=113.46.200.223 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790223236; cv=none; b=MU/6jf0o6m3voNMmGHxhS67mfqrJC0pjdYFVNIDay2B5kVSv2BDU4GmT1y/NOpdEUemCe09RoIyc/tdDgddaGpu0KRr8/5HntDSydT3rprJT2ZuFhcdGVqY9D0/roQKIrHG7vQKflmg9Dqpa3gyjjKDVVgaW8jpTSV4AVHEmY+s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790223236; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xFS2DQH8a+QkjPOVxW75pwg7w718ejXKHRThOGnb0zk=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=fxfzsxbVgmMxs4GJZLGqMOT2/gcz9e5zMnsC2M+Ub/oFueh42oGtE+KJcC0t4dhNvWGVQro0URMpuF91Kgeop99TZ0gHqtta2QXOUjar76hDemwtMuvcqPSP22v4heR3rMalijt5+t+OCeyQgJ+hegSbqEKZvcnYhgJv+NBYKbk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=hisilicon.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b=YDrJG1bm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=113.46.200.223 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=hisilicon.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b="YDrJG1bm" dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=huawei.com; s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; h=From; bh=81yO6Car8MHwRf3Bvrj4RVRvosAl9GnpSah8DBIW3BA=; b=YDrJG1bmelTa/8xqp49tYwTc49N49nkEI5yfp4SaDFakdoz5bMBzAdDPO2Do05y1Nnq8q3RdY XavZJxvPKSi1DUB9PfwUgZ2GmK2QsgwMA9E0TJ/0h9Bgb3mxJwCeWvejuw10x/E4RNQPN/JOCBx pj+gIug/GaImyUF9rQ4f6FQ= Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.200]) by canpmsgout08.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4hr0Wj4CVgzmV98; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 12:01:37 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemk200006.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.202.194.72]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1B334055B; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 12:13:42 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.113.213] (10.67.113.213) by kwepemk200006.china.huawei.com (7.202.194.72) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.45; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 12:13:42 +0800 Message-ID: <6AB4A375.2050004@hisilicon.com> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 12:13:41 +0800 From: Wei Xu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rob Herring , Conor Dooley CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: soc: hisilicon: Add HIP05 CPLD References: <20260921232540.3128596-1-robh@kernel.org> <20260922-cheer-reference-c31fc6fb946d@spud> <20260923150409.GD27237-robh@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260923150409.GD27237-robh@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: kwepems500002.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.17) To kwepemk200006.china.huawei.com (7.202.194.72) Hi Rob, On 2026/9/23 23:04, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 07:06:02PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 06:25:39PM -0500, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote: >>> Add schema for the hisilicon,hip05-cpld node on the HIP05 D02 board. The >>> node only contains the compatible string and one register window on the >>> local bus. >>> >>> Assisted-by: LLM >> >> Guidance to the LLM should probably include including the reason that >> this is being added to the commit message. > > Not sure what you are looking for... I told it to convert all the .txt > bindings to schema. Then I told it fix all the errors. Then I fixed some > things throughout the 900 commit branch upstreaming things bit by bit. > Then it mostly sat for a year and I told a new model to review them and > fix these common problems a, b and c. Then I said fix all the > dtbs_checks warnings on arm64. Then I said there's still warnings, do it > again. Repeated that ~10 times. Now I'm going thru to weed out all the > wrong and sometimes unnecessary changes. > > So LLM did all the easy parts and I did everything that requires any > judgement. The hardest part is typically just figuring out the > correct maintainers... > >>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) >>> --- >>> .../soc/hisilicon/hisilicon,hip05-cpld.yaml | 35 +++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/hisilicon/hisilicon,hip05-cpld.yaml >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/hisilicon/hisilicon,hip05-cpld.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/hisilicon/hisilicon,hip05-cpld.yaml >>> new file mode 100644 >>> index 000000000000..f9d48b871a4b >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/hisilicon/hisilicon,hip05-cpld.yaml >>> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ >>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause >>> +%YAML 1.2 >>> +--- >>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/soc/hisilicon/hisilicon,hip05-cpld.yaml# >>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# >>> + >>> +title: HiSilicon HIP05 CPLD registers >>> + >>> +maintainers: >>> + - Wei Xu >>> + >>> +properties: >>> + compatible: >>> + const: hisilicon,hip05-cpld >>> + >>> + reg: >>> + maxItems: 1 >>> + >>> +required: >>> + - compatible >>> + - reg >>> + >>> +additionalProperties: false >>> + >>> +examples: >>> + - | >>> + local-bus { >>> + #address-cells = <2>; >>> + #size-cells = <1>; >>> + >>> + cpld@100000000 { >>> + compatible = "hisilicon,hip05-cpld"; >>> + reg = <1 0x0 0x100>; >> >> Also what's with this example? 1 0x0 0x100 should be 0x1 0x0 0x100? > > Shrug. Sure. Honestly, I think the example can just be dropped. > > I'm converting all the crap no one cares enough about to convert. That's > pretty much all of the HiSilicon stuff. Mediatek needs some renewed > public shaming too. I only care about getting arm64 down to no warnings. My bad for the warnings! Thanks for working on this schema cleanup! Best Regards, Wei > > Rob > . >