From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from m16.mail.163.com (m16.mail.163.com [117.135.210.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ECD63B3BF2 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 06:33:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=117.135.210.4 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790750022; cv=none; b=jCogSq9XqaaQz/nh2lCJgcoQuG8KD+78BNPLU7nTiw6a2/dNDVJlLVQCwG1d7Wf1l0Oh6HVdOs2H+q7dQRQLrCXl59RalP/z2UWoys4NmUbM8qqVbPvURmTCLbtUZRPBnAwPKDIrlFwv4pmZkDFPF7XaNLds6Y9WKPLfjvQYLXc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790750022; c=relaxed/simple; bh=elQ20eOpdEdO4XcUIyRxsRz7ga6xApYFJYeksfli8MU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Message-Id:Date; b=SBosweTeAu0aitMEvnpdo2AdK8FL80KtHup1S7H97NOK2Yx00vBDSecJ8k/lMFEyCRxZH/pgCBwmET09F7C/z73S4F+ZCfh+fE1nwBz+K1SHw9N6asaTsH+rYP3HDQ9nftXTPYYvFKD3EtSXCfzSKslpXm+nUBJkgXbqtpS0WdY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=163.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=163.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.b=Jwbek1Vc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=117.135.210.4 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=163.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=163.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.b="Jwbek1Vc" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=From:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Message-Id:Date; bh=elQ20eOpdEdO4XcUIyRxsRz7ga6xApYFJYeksfli8MU=; b=Jwbek1VcaFtiK7tjojvyPCuWaeGwfjUIJPcUtaDCzBamT0WTgivzTpCHw4wy3d rq5La+gVlZHuz3h4tnm9WATcRTrpQwuAd70nkBCEnytaK6JvIgXcQHaxc9awgU4Q ofaZ3RdebhK8hvx3rDih4hyK1KwY4n9JPv/F35/t3XL0Q= From: Chaosheng Qu To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/proxy: Correct the SCHED_PROXY_EXEC dependency comment In-Reply-To: <20260930062554.2AwbY2nX@linutronix.de> References: <20260930025824.79296-1-quchaosheng000406@163.com> <20260930062554.2AwbY2nX@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID:_____wD3V4IMrbxqyeFZBw--.51754S2 Message-Id:<6ABCAD0D.07A826.00008@m16.mail.163.com> X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUU529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7v73 VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvj4RKD7TUUUUU Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 14:32:45 +0800 (CST) X-CM-SenderInfo: xtxfxtprvkv0bjqqikiqw6il2tof0z/xtbC4w04rWq8rQ3XHAAA3G Understood, and you are right that the existing line reads fine for the audience it is written for. I was reading it as a developer note about when the dependency can be dropped, which is not what it is there for. Dropping it, the patch is withdrawn. Sorry for the noise.