mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Leonard Göhrs" <l.goehrs@pengutronix.de>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel@pengutronix.de, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] iio: adc: add buffering support to the TI LMP92064 ADC driver
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 09:05:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a1a17df-7436-0434-4fcd-6c5cb4732f47@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230617192729.4868d96f@jic23-huawei>



On 17.06.23 20:27, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 09:55:36 +0200
> Leonard Göhrs <l.goehrs@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> 
>> Enable buffered reading of samples from the LMP92064 ADC.
>> The main benefit of this change is being able to read out current and
>> voltage measurements in a single transfer, allowing instantaneous power
>> measurements.
>>
>> Reads into the buffer can be triggered by any software triggers, e.g.
>> the iio-trig-hrtimer:
>>
>>      $ mkdir /sys/kernel/config/iio/triggers/hrtimer/my-trigger
>>      $ cat /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio\:device3/name
>>      lmp92064
>>      $ iio_readdev -t my-trigger -b 16 iio:device3 | hexdump
>>      WARNING: High-speed mode not enabled
>>      0000000 0000 0176 0101 0001 5507 abd5 7645 1768
>>      0000010 0000 016d 0101 0001 ee1e ac6b 7645 1768
>>      ...
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Leonard Göhrs <l.goehrs@pengutronix.de>
>> ---
>>   drivers/iio/adc/ti-lmp92064.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 54 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-lmp92064.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-lmp92064.c
>> index c30ed824924f3..03765c4057dda 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-lmp92064.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-lmp92064.c
>> @@ -16,7 +16,10 @@
>>   #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
>>   
>>   #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
>> +#include <linux/iio/buffer.h>
>>   #include <linux/iio/driver.h>
>> +#include <linux/iio/triggered_buffer.h>
>> +#include <linux/iio/trigger_consumer.h>
>>   
>>   #define TI_LMP92064_REG_CONFIG_A 0x0000
>>   #define TI_LMP92064_REG_CONFIG_B 0x0001
>> @@ -91,6 +94,13 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec lmp92064_adc_channels[] = {
>>   		.address = TI_LMP92064_CHAN_INC,
>>   		.info_mask_separate =
>>   			BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) | BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE),
>> +		.scan_index = 0,
>> +		.scan_type = {
>> +			.sign = 'u',
>> +			.realbits = 12,
>> +			.storagebits = 16,
>> +			.shift = 0,
> 
> As zero is the 'obvious' default for shift (do nothing case) and c will set it to 0 for
> you anyway, no need to set it explicitly like this.
> 
>> +		},
>>   		.datasheet_name = "INC",
>>   	},
>>   	{
>> @@ -98,8 +108,16 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec lmp92064_adc_channels[] = {
>>   		.address = TI_LMP92064_CHAN_INV,
>>   		.info_mask_separate =
>>   			BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) | BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE),
>> +		.scan_index = 1,
>> +		.scan_type = {
>> +			.sign = 'u',
>> +			.realbits = 12,
>> +			.storagebits = 16,
>> +			.shift = 0,
> 
> Same here. No need for this last line.
> 
>> +		},
>>   		.datasheet_name = "INV",
>>   	},
>> +	IIO_CHAN_SOFT_TIMESTAMP(2),
>>   };
>>   
>>   static int lmp92064_read_meas(struct lmp92064_adc_priv *priv, u16 *res)
>> @@ -171,6 +189,37 @@ static int lmp92064_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>>   	}
>>   }
>>   
>> +static irqreturn_t lmp92064_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
>> +{
>> +	struct iio_poll_func *pf = p;
>> +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = pf->indio_dev;
>> +	struct lmp92064_adc_priv *priv = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>> +	int i = 0, j, ret;
>> +	u16 raw[2];
>> +	u16 *data;
>> +
>> +	ret = lmp92064_read_meas(priv, raw);
>> +	if (ret < 0)
>> +		goto done;
>> +
>> +	data = kmalloc(indio_dev->scan_bytes, GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> A driver shouldn't be directly accessing scan_bytes.
> You will see iio.h that it is marked [INTERN] to show it should only be accessed
> by the IIO core code.
> 
> The reasoning is closely related to Lars' point. This is almost always a small
> structure with a known maximum size (across all possible channel configurations)
> so allocate that space once not every scan (will be 16 bytes I think)

Sounds reasonable. I've more or less copied the trigger handler from
iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c assuming it contained the best practice when
it comes to buffer handling w.r.t. size and alignment (which I was not quite
sure about how to do right).

I've sent a V2 now that uses a stack allocated structure as buffer. This makes
the whole trigger handler a lot more concise.

>> +	if (!data)
>> +		goto done;
>> +
>> +	for_each_set_bit(j, indio_dev->active_scan_mask, indio_dev->masklength)
>> +		data[i++] = raw[j];
> When a sensor 'always' reads the two channels, we can leave the necessary data
> mangling up to the IIO core.
> 
> Provide available_scan_masks and then always push the lot every time.
> Mostly people will want both channels anyway (as they paid for them ;)
> so that core code that moves the data around will do nothing.  In the cases
> where they only want one channel it will handle the complexity for you.

Thanks for the tip! This simplifies the trigger handler even further.

>> +
>> +	iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, data,
>> +					   iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev));
>> +
>> +	kfree(data);
>> +
>> +done:
>> +	iio_trigger_notify_done(indio_dev->trig);
>> +
>> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int lmp92064_reset(struct lmp92064_adc_priv *priv,
>>   			  struct gpio_desc *gpio_reset)
>>   {
>> @@ -302,6 +351,11 @@ static int lmp92064_adc_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>>   	indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(lmp92064_adc_channels);
>>   	indio_dev->info = &lmp92064_adc_info;
>>   
>> +	ret = devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup(dev, indio_dev, NULL,
>> +					      lmp92064_trigger_handler, NULL);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to setup buffered read\n");
>> +
>>   	return devm_iio_device_register(dev, indio_dev);
>>   }
>>   
>>
>> base-commit: 9561de3a55bed6bdd44a12820ba81ec416e705a7
> 
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2023-06-22  7:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-14  7:55 Leonard Göhrs
2023-06-14 11:59 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2023-06-17 18:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-22  7:05   ` Leonard Göhrs [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6a1a17df-7436-0434-4fcd-6c5cb4732f47@pengutronix.de \
    --to=l.goehrs@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®