Re: [RFC patch 0/5] Support BCLK input clock in tlv320aic31xx

[Ariel D'Alessandro <ariel.dalessandro@collabora.com>]

Hi Mark,

On 11/22/21 9:00 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 12:32:43 -0300, Ariel D'Alessandro wrote:
>> The tlv320aic31xx codec allows using BCLK as the input clock for PLL,
>> deriving all the frequencies through a set of divisors.
>>
>> In this case, codec sysclk is determined by the hwparams sample
>> rate/format. So its frequency must be updated from the codec itself when
>> these are changed.
>>
>> [...]
> 
> Applied to
> 
>    https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> [1/5] ASoC: tlv320aic31xx: Fix typo in BCLK clock name
>       commit: 7016fd940adf2f4d86032339b546c6ecd737062f
> [2/5] ASoC: tlv320aic31xx: Add support for pll_r coefficient
>       commit: 2664b24a8c51c21b24c2b37b7f10d6485c35b7c1
> [3/5] ASoC: tlv320aic31xx: Add divs for bclk as clk_in
>       commit: 6e6752a9c78738e27bde6da5cefa393b589276bb
> [4/5] ASoC: tlv320aic31xx: Handle BCLK set as PLL input configuration
>       commit: c5d22d5e12e776fee4e346dc098fe51d00c2f983
> [5/5] ASoC: fsl-asoc-card: Support fsl,imx-audio-tlv320aic31xx codec
>       commit: 8c9b9cfb7724685ce705f511b882f30597596536
> 
> All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
> tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
> the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
> problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
> 
> You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
> and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
> send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
> 
> If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
> should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
> patches will not be replaced.

Quick question:

I gotta send a fix for one of the patches. So, should it be a new
incremental patch or I can still send a patchset v2?

Also, I sent an incremental update patchset on top of this one:

  [PATCH 0/4] fsl-asoc-card: Add optional dt property for setting mclk-id

I could merge altogether on a patchset v2. Please let me know, and sorry
the process it's not clear to me :-)

Thanks,
Ariel