From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751569AbdIUEnX (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:43:23 -0400 Received: from m175-177.vip.163.com ([123.58.177.175]:12427 "EHLO m175-177.vip.163.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750912AbdIUEnW (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:43:22 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 308 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:43:21 EDT X-Originating-IP: [221.222.138.68] Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 12:37:58 +0800 (CST) From: "Gao Feng" To: "David Miller" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re:Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Remove useless function skb_header_release X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Coremail Webmail Server Version SP_ntes V3.5 build 20160420(83524.8626) Copyright (c) 2002-2017 www.mailtech.cn 163vip In-Reply-To: <20170920.143046.2158440945427935660.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1505831568-25706-1-git-send-email-gfree.wind@vip.163.com> <20170920.143046.2158440945427935660.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GBK MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <6a7c6d34.4558.15ea2ba6703.Coremail.gfree.wind@vip.163.com> X-Coremail-Locale: zh_CN X-CM-TRANSID: r2Z4CgD3_z4pQsNZXDm8AA--.34244W X-CM-SenderInfo: 5jiuvvgozl0vg6yl1hqrwthudrp/1tbiCQpZs1gAnsutpwABsv X-Coremail-Antispam: 1U5529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7vcSsGvfC2KfnxnUU== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by nfs id v8L4hSA2028855 At 2017-09-21 05:30:46, "David Miller" wrote: >From: gfree.wind@vip.163.com >Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 22:32:48 +0800 > >> From: Gao Feng >> >> There is no one which would invokes the function skb_header_release. >> So just remove it now. >> >> Signed-off-by: Gao Feng > >Networking patches must be at least CC:'d to netdev@vger.kernel.org, >thank you. Thanks your reminder. I just used the result of get_maintainer.pl, and didn't noticed this point you mentioned. I would send it again. Regards Feng