From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-oi1-f199.google.com (mail-oi1-f199.google.com [209.85.167.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA162411FA7 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 08:19:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.167.199 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789114745; cv=none; b=aKqVw8SQV+7XNVNNOCbRYlcrrR8HynBtOgFPLhjc2sDoNlFGk+Jnx73yCAeDY2hXnz0UGI8NFJ+agGBmjP5TmSy8u0oWRpkuQY8F1l2ATJuRatiSLy2Isrf403qvaeSyB8CI20h3utHJ9+3XPUTAXOQZ4Y1NOSL+8pwf5AxEOSs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789114745; c=relaxed/simple; bh=A2zVX8VvI3N334ybPtUJw5lWw8I70BIXgPKVFNyIL60=; h=MIME-Version:Date:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:From:To: Content-Type; b=r9OkSZlkNYXO5c1oR3/VBCfZ+eoBUJ8PcM+IybcZLH1PjhXaZOuLTYRyEzXNPxH9JDF8tzpRpPYuzJ4P7eIQwHGDb3lXxeiC4K1F0/brsjm1WBOeST6wgz27MKg4NM0R9h93QJs7+OfW5K61qPHR1AKo7IjqOG+DZbBAOx/laPs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=syzkaller.appspotmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=M3KW2WVRGUFZ5GODRSRYTGD7.apphosting.bounces.google.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.167.199 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=syzkaller.appspotmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=M3KW2WVRGUFZ5GODRSRYTGD7.apphosting.bounces.google.com Received: by mail-oi1-f199.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-4c307941971so914428b6e.1 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 01:19:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1789114743; x=1789719543; h=content-type:to:from:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:date :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to:content-type; bh=xNQFdeIQdxUvSZ80TevHR2q/n/cHRmrNydJ5vvU3C5o=; b=fodJshRRC8ynCvfZ65oYneAi4fYmzHGQCmHN0cNPIZqOL3jYXrPraUS1pskpmLEhJR 1ttdwj9Tozfk0B8HqoVpXhNT8ZGk5zdrQOjIUyGTot8lm3f47LjySdE1kYcdstAsVIFf gR5XiPy4BWqFdLfHWqjiE3eq2mOQRX2RxKDT3U0tRKI/JBcpd5qdFi5/WxKHRE1dGC5L MFp/DesuYDGoT4pqX1cApmHaR3PQ3StF6VAIjWny8oV3KTPQjRlnazC85MkTgssa6ZRq bIyJ6c6AvRcWSj8BTMKYCGWNVpRWt1PfMer9p2avqfzsgHtykvwiLVl0F46vWSjHfgjt lCZg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvBxvi2cJIx3zBa1iqq4PQBNGMXnzyT+CDDYRBOTiDI6590XvN7yMc1xutr3nXD1HxFxhhb6qTk56oMZh7zM=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AFuF++lWd1GyLc/B4+J1lOJzSFBfd3mbn5sV8Bdhq9hPw2X8wd5WYq+4 ncpoDhhViu1LdsdY4p1FRQCuxs8fs6Btu1B84K+qp4gpXHPhIXNFSHsJFozPoUaKYlI0DmFux14 Q0fNGbvLX4KFRH2Ci6LwB8RemIlFVCMAYaqiPI1fT0zzyXtRj7462Ot/L3wU= Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:6411:b0:4b9:a829:f00e with SMTP id 5614622812f47-4c31b9d47a4mr2462732b6e.26.1789114742755; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 01:19:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 01:19:02 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20260911075558.849153-1-eadavis@sina.com> X-Google-Appengine-App-Id: s~syzkaller X-Google-Appengine-App-Id-Alias: syzkaller Message-ID: <6aa3b976.f2639fcc.29487d.0025.GAE@google.com> Subject: Re: [syzbot] [jffs2?] possible deadlock in jffs2_do_clear_inode (2) From: syzbot To: eadavis@sina.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello, syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer is still triggering an issue: possible deadlock in jffs2_do_clear_inode ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/111 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888013343ce0 (&f->sem){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: jffs2_do_clear_inode+0x5a/0x470 fs/jffs2/readinode.c:1419 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8efc9a20 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0xbce/0x1f00 mm/vmscan.c:7292 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5942 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1d1/0x380 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5899 __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:4375 [inline] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xc4/0x100 mm/page_alloc.c:4389 might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:316 [inline] slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:4636 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:4974 [inline] __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:5413 [inline] __kmalloc_noprof+0xce/0x840 mm/slub.c:5439 _kmalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:995 [inline] jffs2_get_inode_nodes fs/jffs2/readinode.c:997 [inline] jffs2_do_read_inode_internal+0x13d/0x4ac0 fs/jffs2/readinode.c:1160 jffs2_do_read_inode+0x1b3/0x520 fs/jffs2/readinode.c:1389 jffs2_iget+0x32b/0xe30 fs/jffs2/fs.c:277 jffs2_do_fill_super+0x44b/0xa50 fs/jffs2/fs.c:578 jffs2_fill_super+0x283/0x370 fs/jffs2/super.c:290 mtd_get_sb+0x2f0/0x4c0 drivers/mtd/mtdsuper.c:57 mtd_get_sb_by_nr drivers/mtd/mtdsuper.c:88 [inline] get_tree_mtd+0x6f9/0x8a0 drivers/mtd/mtdsuper.c:141 vfs_get_tree+0x92/0x320 fs/super.c:1947 fc_mount fs/namespace.c:1198 [inline] do_new_mount_fc fs/namespace.c:3772 [inline] do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3848 [inline] path_mount+0x7d0/0x24c0 fs/namespace.c:4168 do_mount fs/namespace.c:4181 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:4397 [inline] __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:4374 [inline] __ia32_sys_mount+0x292/0x310 fs/namespace.c:4374 do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/syscall_32.c:79 [inline] __do_fast_syscall_32+0x13a/0x8b0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_32.c:291 do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x70 arch/x86/entry/syscall_32.c:316 entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e -> #0 (&f->sem){+.+.}-{4:4}: check_prev_add+0xeb/0xe60 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3209 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3328 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3952 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x1528/0x1f40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5288 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5942 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1d1/0x380 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5899 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:646 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x1a4/0x1bd0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:821 jffs2_do_clear_inode+0x5a/0x470 fs/jffs2/readinode.c:1419 evict+0x3c2/0xad0 fs/inode.c:822 dispose_list+0x117/0x1e0 fs/inode.c:864 prune_icache_sb+0xea/0x150 fs/inode.c:1011 super_cache_scan+0x3ac/0x5c0 fs/super.c:240 do_shrink_slab+0x416/0x1200 mm/shrinker.c:443 shrink_slab_memcg mm/shrinker.c:560 [inline] shrink_slab+0xa82/0x12e0 mm/shrinker.c:638 shrink_one+0x398/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:5119 shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:5180 [inline] lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:5258 [inline] shrink_node+0x2b20/0x4320 mm/vmscan.c:6247 kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:7101 [inline] balance_pgdat+0xb20/0x1f00 mm/vmscan.c:7279 kswapd+0x556/0xb50 mm/vmscan.c:7555 kthread+0x373/0x450 kernel/kthread.c:436 ret_from_fork+0x730/0xd60 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&f->sem); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&f->sem); *** DEADLOCK *** locks held by kswapd0/111: 2, last CPU#1: #0: ffffffff8efc9a20 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0xbce/0x1f00 mm/vmscan.c:7292 #1: ffff88804ba6e0e8 (&type->s_umount_key#57){++++}-{4:4}, at: super_trylock_shared fs/super.c:688 [inline] #1: ffff88804ba6e0e8 (&type->s_umount_key#57){++++}-{4:4}, at: super_cache_scan+0x9b/0x5c0 fs/super.c:213 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 111 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x100/0x190 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_circular_bug.cold+0x178/0x1be kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2087 check_noncircular+0x146/0x160 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2219 check_prev_add+0xeb/0xe60 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3209 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3328 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3952 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x1528/0x1f40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5288 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5942 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1d1/0x380 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5899 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:646 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x1a4/0x1bd0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:821 jffs2_do_clear_inode+0x5a/0x470 fs/jffs2/readinode.c:1419 evict+0x3c2/0xad0 fs/inode.c:822 dispose_list+0x117/0x1e0 fs/inode.c:864 prune_icache_sb+0xea/0x150 fs/inode.c:1011 super_cache_scan+0x3ac/0x5c0 fs/super.c:240 do_shrink_slab+0x416/0x1200 mm/shrinker.c:443 shrink_slab_memcg mm/shrinker.c:560 [inline] shrink_slab+0xa82/0x12e0 mm/shrinker.c:638 shrink_one+0x398/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:5119 shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:5180 [inline] lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:5258 [inline] shrink_node+0x2b20/0x4320 mm/vmscan.c:6247 kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:7101 [inline] balance_pgdat+0xb20/0x1f00 mm/vmscan.c:7279 kswapd+0x556/0xb50 mm/vmscan.c:7555 kthread+0x373/0x450 kernel/kthread.c:436 ret_from_fork+0x730/0xd60 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245 Tested on: commit: 50d05c7c Merge tag 'landlock-7.3-rc3' of git://git.ker.. git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=10391871580000 kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=85bc5cc2fc7394d9 dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=743079a09058321247d8 compiler: gcc (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.44 userspace arch: i386 patch: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/patch.diff?x=154d7749580000