mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zheng Shuhao <viennaoffh@gmail.com>
To: "Carlos Maiolino" <cem@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org,
	syzbot+e7f24354da9f7915bc54@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix slab-use-after-free in xrep_newbt_free()
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 22:16:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ad231b5.6655ddc8.1e37bf.a74a@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <atIj2DeA3TOMJQ2-@cronus.toxiclabs.cc>

Hi Carlos,

Thank you for the pointer, and my apologies for the confusion. This is
my first patch submission to the Linux kernel, and I was not aware of the
known-identity requirement for patch authorship and Signed-off-by.
Understood now; I will use my real name for all future submissions:

    Zheng Shuhao <viennaoffh@gmail.com>

(vienna-0FFH was my GitHub handle only.)

For reference, this is the testing I did on the patch before posting:

 * Built the patched tree with KASAN + XFS_DEBUG enabled; checkpatch.pl
   --strict reports 0 errors and 0 warnings.
 * Reproduced the use-after-free deterministically in QEMU on an
   unpatched kernel; the KASAN splat matches the syzbot report exactly
   (xfs_defer_item_unpause <- xrep_newbt_free <- xrep_bmap_build_new_fork,
   and the xfs_defer_pending object is freed by xfs_defer_finish_noroll).
 * With the patch applied, the same trigger produces no KASAN report: the
   scrub ioctl just returns -EIO and the shutdown path unwinds cleanly.
 * Regression runs on the patched kernel: all metadata scrub types,
   invalid scrub inputs (bad flags/generation/agno/type), and forced bmap
   btree rebuilds from 5 up to 1500 extents (covering both extents- and
   btree-format forks), with read-back verification of the files. No
   regressions; normal scrub/repair paths still succeed.

I can share the reproducer and test scripts if that is useful.

Would you prefer that I resend this as v2 with the correct
From:/Signed-off-by: lines, or can you fix up the authorship when
applying? Either way works for me.

Thanks,
Zheng Shuhao

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-16 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-16  8:55 vienna-0FFH
2026-10-16 13:17 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-10-16 14:16   ` Zheng Shuhao [this message]
2026-10-16 15:23 ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6ad231b5.6655ddc8.1e37bf.a74a@mx.google.com \
    --to=viennaoffh@gmail.com \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+e7f24354da9f7915bc54@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®