From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S933747AbcIAL02 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 1 Sep 2016 07:26:28 -0400
Received: from mailout4.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.14]:58632 "EHLO
        mailout4.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S932636AbcIAL0Z (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 1 Sep 2016 07:26:25 -0400
X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-f792e6d0000013f5-d8-57c8104b71a1
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: exynos: Fix mismatched values of SD drive
 strengh configuration on exynos4415
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
References: <1472719022-27226-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
 <1472719022-27226-2-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
 <3122615.TmPyqONA3V@amdc1976>
Cc: javier@osg.samsung.com, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Message-id: <6af62df7-1740-4168-4edc-63b6f1c699ae@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 13:26:02 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-version: 1.0
In-reply-to: <3122615.TmPyqONA3V@amdc1976>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrLLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xq7reAifCDbbfU7D4O+kYu8XGGetZ
        LeYfOcdq8ebtGiaL1y8MLfofv2a2OH9+A7vFpsfXWC0u75rDZjHj/D4mBy6P378mMXpsWtXJ
        5rF5Sb3Hlv677B59W1YxenzeJBfAFsVlk5Kak1mWWqRvl8CV8fb5RbaCLUwVl5a3MTcwfmXs
        YuTkkBAwkdj9/DgLhC0mceHeerYuRi4OIYGljBI/L69ghnCeMUrsvbGfDaRKWKBIYnrbBLAO
        EQELibUr3rLAdSza8J0dxGEW6GCSWHX6LytIFZuAscTm5UvAunkF7CTm9L5i6mLk4GARUJXo
        /lMAEhYViJC4teojI0SJoMSPyffAFnAKaElM39nODlLOLKAncf+iFkiYWUBeYvOat8wTGAVm
        IemYhVA1C0nVAkbmVYyiqaXJBcVJ6blGesWJucWleel6yfm5mxghkfB1B+PSY1aHGAU4GJV4
        eB3eHAsXYk0sK67MPcQowcGsJMJrxH8iXIg3JbGyKrUoP76oNCe1+BCjNAeLkjjvzF3vQ4QE
        0hNLUrNTUwtSi2CyTBycUg2MTkEJai+Nv4oaOeeGdCVW5BRoJ+45wP1XZse9YOHpP3NYzZdO
        1zuu8C9BpskhsHlDzKIpLk4btxmFZQexMMSxXSu0nPEwyvrb950TTGWCbl/JqF59hLvl702D
        qTfFdod4vP/K+XVtosqvL+kqXjFsrTud/jye4GYd9aB3TXHSwYwrl8K2BxQpsRRnJBpqMRcV
        JwIA5frlq4ACAAA=
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 09/01/2016 01:21 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> BTW This reminds me that there are still no board files for Exynos4415
> SoC based boards so maybe we should consider removal of its support?

Fine with me. I would ack such patches so (anyone) please go ahead. :)

Best regards,
Krzysztof