From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5684C433DB for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:32:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C92C22A84 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:32:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729111AbhAKKcj (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 05:32:39 -0500 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]:10954 "EHLO szxga06-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726295AbhAKKci (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 05:32:38 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS411-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by szxga06-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4DDqk44DKGzj4xl; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 18:31:08 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.136.114.67] (10.136.114.67) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.211) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.498.0; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 18:31:54 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] f2fs: compress: add compress_inode to cache compressed blocks To: Jaegeuk Kim CC: , , References: <20210107093126.116958-1-yuchao0@huawei.com> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <6b0060b9-460a-617a-3778-e67f35d551f0@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 18:31:53 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.136.114.67] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021/1/11 17:48, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > Hi Chao, > > After quick test of fsstress w/ fault injection, it gave wrong block address > errors. Could you please run the test a bit? Jaegeuk, Oh, I've covered with fstest cases and there is no such error message, let me try fault injection + SPO case soon. Thanks,