From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Sean Christopherson" <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Grab KVM's srcu lock when setting nested state
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2019 11:30:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b07bcb9-a640-7ffe-36cf-370702f20d4b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191122165818.32558-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
On 22/11/19 17:58, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Acquire kvm->srcu for the duration of ->set_nested_state() to fix a bug
> where nVMX derefences ->memslots without holding ->srcu or ->slots_lock.
>
> The other half of nested migration, ->get_nested_state(), does not need
> to acquire ->srcu as it is a purely a dump of internal KVM (and CPU)
> state to userspace.
>
> Detected as an RCU lockdep splat that is 100% reproducible by running
> KVM's state_test selftest with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y. Note that the
> failing function, kvm_is_visible_gfn(), is only checking the validity of
> a gfn, it's not actually accessing guest memory (which is more or less
> unsupported during vmx_set_nested_state() due to incorrect MMU state),
> i.e. vmx_set_nested_state() itself isn't fundamentally broken. In any
> case, setting nested state isn't a fast path so there's no reason to go
> out of our way to avoid taking ->srcu.
>
> =============================
> WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
> 5.4.0-rc7+ #94 Not tainted
> -----------------------------
> include/linux/kvm_host.h:626 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
> 1 lock held by evmcs_test/10939:
> #0: ffff88826ffcb800 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at: kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x85/0x630 [kvm]
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 1 PID: 10939 Comm: evmcs_test Not tainted 5.4.0-rc7+ #94
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
> Call Trace:
> dump_stack+0x68/0x9b
> kvm_is_visible_gfn+0x179/0x180 [kvm]
> mmu_check_root+0x11/0x30 [kvm]
> fast_cr3_switch+0x40/0x120 [kvm]
> kvm_mmu_new_cr3+0x34/0x60 [kvm]
> nested_vmx_load_cr3+0xbd/0x1f0 [kvm_intel]
> nested_vmx_enter_non_root_mode+0xab8/0x1d60 [kvm_intel]
> vmx_set_nested_state+0x256/0x340 [kvm_intel]
> kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl+0x491/0x11a0 [kvm]
> kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0xde/0x630 [kvm]
> do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6c0
> ksys_ioctl+0x66/0x70
> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
> do_syscall_64+0x54/0x200
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
> RIP: 0033:0x7f59a2b95f47
>
> Fixes: 8fcc4b5923af5 ("kvm: nVMX: Introduce KVM_CAP_NESTED_STATE")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 5d530521f11d..656878a9802e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -4421,6 +4421,7 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> case KVM_SET_NESTED_STATE: {
> struct kvm_nested_state __user *user_kvm_nested_state = argp;
> struct kvm_nested_state kvm_state;
> + int idx;
>
> r = -EINVAL;
> if (!kvm_x86_ops->set_nested_state)
> @@ -4444,7 +4445,9 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> && !(kvm_state.flags & KVM_STATE_NESTED_GUEST_MODE))
> break;
>
> + idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
> r = kvm_x86_ops->set_nested_state(vcpu, user_kvm_nested_state, &kvm_state);
> + srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, idx);
> break;
> }
> case KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_HV_CPUID: {
>
Queued, thanks.
Paolo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-23 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-22 16:58 Sean Christopherson
2019-11-23 10:30 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6b07bcb9-a640-7ffe-36cf-370702f20d4b@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®