From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758761AbdELR3L (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 May 2017 13:29:11 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:58204 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758078AbdELR3H (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 May 2017 13:29:07 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 6CFF960886 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=jhugo@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] sched/fair: Fix load_balance() affinity redo path To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dietmar Eggemann , Austin Christ , Tyler Baicar References: <1494608498-4538-1-git-send-email-jhugo@codeaurora.org> <1494608498-4538-2-git-send-email-jhugo@codeaurora.org> <20170512172334.yusgrt5qpc62wc5p@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> From: Jeffrey Hugo Message-ID: <6b0aaedf-ed9a-6028-7bdc-9548f55d69af@codeaurora.org> Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 11:29:05 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170512172334.yusgrt5qpc62wc5p@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/12/2017 11:23 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 11:01:37AM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Austin Christ >> Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann >> Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo > > So per that Chain Austin wrote the patch, who handed it to Dietmar, who > handed it to you. Except I don't see a From: Austin on. > > What gives? > Austin and I did the investigations and wrote the initial version. We discussed it with Dietmar, who suggested some significant rewrites which we felt added to the readability of the code. The current version posted on the list you've seen was basically written by all three of us, so I listed the authors in alphabetical order to properly give credit to all involved. Is there a better way to handle patches which have authorship from multiple people? -- Jeffrey Hugo Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.