From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Diego Fernando Mancera Gomez <diegomancera.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@foss.st.com>,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memory: stm32_omm: fix child clock leak on set_amcr() error path
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 19:57:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b0fc3a4-6c79-4fae-aef1-2880f0faef80@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALruWrUYnufzE3Lqm4=32_nSJVSVRRR9oeU0fGNhLfr7uyJoaA@mail.gmail.com>
On 23/09/2026 18:35, Diego Fernando Mancera Gomez wrote:
> Without st,omm-mux, of_property_read_u32() fails and leaves mux at its
> initial value of 0, so the "if (mux & CR_MUXEN)" block is skipped and
> the child clocks are never enabled in stm32_omm_configure(). The new
> check is then false and nothing is disabled on the set_amcr() error
> path, so there is nothing to leak and no unbalanced
> clk_disable_unprepare().
>
> The cleanup uses exactly the same condition that gated
> stm32_omm_toggle_child_clock(dev, true), so this also covers the case
> where st,omm-mux is present but CR_MUXEN is not set. The earlier
> "goto error" paths are all taken before the clocks are enabled, or
> from toggle_child_clock() itself, which already unwinds on failure.
>
> If it helps, I can send a v2 that states this in the commit message.
Oohh, I see... I also see simple code paths were made here originally
complicated. To figure out if the cleanup has to happen or not, one has
to follow three places/variables. ret, mux & CR_MUXEN and where the mux
is even initialized.
Side note, feels like you used LLM to reply to me. This reply is exactly
what LLMs are sending to us. 100%. If that happened, then be careful not
to ever repeat that. I don't want to talk with someone's LLM through
that person.
>
> Best regards,
> Diego
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 8:54 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 18/09/2026 01:59, Diego Fernando Mancera Gomez wrote:
>>> When the mux is enabled, stm32_omm_configure() enables the two OSPI
>>> child clocks via stm32_omm_toggle_child_clock(dev, true); they are meant
>>> to stay enabled for the device's lifetime and are disabled again in
>>> stm32_omm_remove() and on the devm_of_platform_populate() error path.
>>>
>>> However, if the subsequent stm32_omm_set_amcr() call fails, the function
>>> jumps to the "error:" label which only calls pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend()
>>> before returning, leaving the two child clocks enabled. As this happens
>>> during probe, the error is propagated and .remove() is never called, so
>>> the clock enable references are leaked. devm_clk_bulk_get() only releases
>>> the clock handles on unwind, it does not undo clk_prepare_enable().
>>>
>>> Disable the child clocks on the set_amcr() error path, mirroring the
>>> cleanup already done on the devm_of_platform_populate() failure path.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 8181d061dcff ("memory: Add STM32 Octo Memory Manager driver")
>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Diego Fernando Mancera Gomez <diegomancera.dev@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/memory/stm32_omm.c | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/memory/stm32_omm.c b/drivers/memory/stm32_omm.c
>>> index 84eb23c824f5..3599683ab04a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/memory/stm32_omm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/memory/stm32_omm.c
>>> @@ -274,6 +274,8 @@ static int stm32_omm_configure(struct device *dev)
>>> writel_relaxed(omm->cr, omm->io_base + OMM_CR);
>>>
>>> ret = stm32_omm_set_amcr(dev, true);
>>> + if (ret && (mux & CR_MUXEN))
>>> + stm32_omm_toggle_child_clock(dev, false);
>>
>> How does it work without st,omm-mux?
>>
>>>
>>> error:
>>> pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(dev);
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-23 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 23:59 Diego Fernando Mancera Gomez
2026-09-23 14:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-23 16:35 ` Diego Fernando Mancera Gomez
2026-09-23 17:57 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2026-09-23 18:01 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6b0fc3a4-6c79-4fae-aef1-2880f0faef80@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=christophe.kerello@foss.st.com \
--cc=diegomancera.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=patrice.chotard@foss.st.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®