From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx.nabladev.com (mx.nabladev.com [178.251.229.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFBF03F4829; Thu, 1 Oct 2026 23:11:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.251.229.89 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790896310; cv=none; b=t0c+UKVFRjKtLk4OmZRtVHwJHEfgMW44lkOyFSWJzFzyoqYko4RFKUUXTYdWDpdk3SHzvbpleM8JXrytr1oecDL2A6B1QcR0mx2OVmk1mb+g519Q93kvExUYEmQ7egXxgSemYsjwoLFkIEVMgPLfAsJcbZdRf835Wg1b4/sOilo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790896310; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kNFSA9YbKim6YXQDkqz9wzqYtqo1Z8c0lWeDeMGLLh0=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Aso7SLTfFrKgi9jAo6OF2whXf37CamXzZaGiPAaH3inwXKVKU215q9tdd5312muBx72ZaLngRUkdTa2TN91EIuZG0SFEsUP5hgtn8xzzNdf6ZwzZngwI4eyBjB/5/hGcN1jWY6dsvNmdjleJmxMC8+3624KJzpGmImC+YyvXElc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=nabladev.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nabladev.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nabladev.com header.i=@nabladev.com header.b=ecCQFT7o; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.251.229.89 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=nabladev.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nabladev.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nabladev.com header.i=@nabladev.com header.b="ecCQFT7o" Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 8F91C1073CF; Fri, 02 Oct 2026 01:11:37 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nabladev.com; s=dkim; t=1790896302; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:references; bh=rsGAq8HSvUzJC7GII4xXk2cib1xNUHDcCfOGhmM7R8w=; b=ecCQFT7oep5Tubzy6dA+uBD3p67i3cFCCV3uzfe+vvz7HdkODym4wXpLPyJAHtirOIS1L8 OSJhhuzZL5Km52yHqQ1boi46dX/joU+VtDA7NLil3JUiIY7YFhuja9AFHU+QifS2q7HLWY 7fDo7/m7tUUXed2SHjenn3gxTi/9FPh2AKmnM2pDRmtO/o9qNq0+Cq4nVU+toWtZabe7ED XLPUaiI5eFfWFsqb15n7Il2LTY5EWqEV/hH04sBGSjsG4z4lWCmONsjo1pXXraEHh1kT5A tyCrX9WtO6ryb11hkEwVHri8CVLzA6h9Eg9nVvHZ3T08UxkqQ6i2ImO4zxXozA== Message-ID: <6b22d5e7-1f94-4c3c-8a0e-5c5573c4c7cb@nabladev.com> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2026 01:11:36 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [net-next,PATCH v2] enetc: Increase eMDIO MDC rate to 2.5 MHz To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Wei Fang , Clark Wang , Claudiu Manoil , Vladimir Oltean , "David S. Miller" , Andrew Lunn , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , "imx@lists.linux.dev" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" References: <20260924180607.60932-1-marex@nabladev.com> <20261001155129.51ea9930@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Marek Vasut In-Reply-To: <20261001155129.51ea9930@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 On 10/2/26 12:51 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Thu, 1 Oct 2026 03:34:09 +0200 Marek Vasut wrote: >> Jakub, do you want a revert of this one, fix, or follow up patch ? > > FWIW the answer was follow up, thanks for sending it! Of course, sorry for the mess this created. I'll try to figure out some more flexible way of configuring the MDC clock together with Wei, basically what Andrew suggested, in another follow up patch. Hopefully there is a way to do that for all the SoCs which have this IP.