From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=shi3=4A=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_SANE_1
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27690C35242
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 01:35:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0065420724
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 01:35:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1728165AbgBLBfW (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 11 Feb 2020 20:35:22 -0500
Received: from out30-42.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.42]:42036 "EHLO
        out30-42.freemail.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
        by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727865AbgBLBfV (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 11 Feb 2020 20:35:21 -0500
X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R111e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e07417;MF=yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=9;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0Tpjb1uS_1581471318;
Received: from testdeMacBook-Pro.local(mailfrom:yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0Tpjb1uS_1581471318)
          by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1);
          Wed, 12 Feb 2020 09:35:19 +0800
Subject: Re: [RFC] why can't dynamic isolation just like the static way
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
        "open list:SCHEDULER" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <fed10a26-7423-23b5-316c-c74d354870dd@linux.alibaba.com>
 <20200211114350.GJ14914@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20200211090028.4e12d02e@gandalf.local.home>
From:   =?UTF-8?B?546L6LSH?= <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Message-ID: <6b4fda32-b9b0-b8ce-968e-7e5a65a7e1f0@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Feb 2020 09:35:18 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:68.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200211090028.4e12d02e@gandalf.local.home>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org



On 2020/2/11 下午10:00, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:43:50 +0100
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 04:17:34PM +0800, 王贇 wrote:
>>> Hi, folks
>>>
>>> We are dealing with isolcpus these days and try to do the isolation
>>> dynamically.
>>>
>>> The kernel doc lead us into the cpuset.sched_load_balance, it's fine
>>> to achieve the dynamic isolation with it, however we got problem with
>>> the systemd stuff.  
>>
>> Then don't use systemd :-) Also, if systemd is the problem, why are you
>> bugging us?
> 
> [ Background. Peter is someone that doesn't even use systemd. ;-) ]

I would be happy to get rid of that too ;-) but seems like it's getting
popular now as the basic init stuff, and I guess they have no idea about
how they are breaking the dynamic isolation.

Regards,
Michael Wang

> 
> -- Steve
>