mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/vPMU: Declare kvm_pmu->reprogram_pmi field using DECLARE_BITMAP
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 13:40:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b7569cf-5977-6992-8c97-cd8a11660f3d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191021105504.120838-1-like.xu@linux.intel.com>

On 21/10/19 12:55, Like Xu wrote:
> Replace the explicit declaration of "u64 reprogram_pmi" with the generic
> macro DECLARE_BITMAP for all possible appropriate number of bits.
> 
> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  2 +-
>  arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c              | 15 +++++----------
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 50eb430b0ad8..236a876a5a2e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ struct kvm_pmu {
>  	struct kvm_pmc gp_counters[INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC];
>  	struct kvm_pmc fixed_counters[INTEL_PMC_MAX_FIXED];
>  	struct irq_work irq_work;
> -	u64 reprogram_pmi;
> +	DECLARE_BITMAP(reprogram_pmi, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX);
>  };
>  
>  struct kvm_pmu_ops;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
> index 46875bbd0419..75e8f9fae031 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
> @@ -62,8 +62,7 @@ static void kvm_perf_overflow(struct perf_event *perf_event,
>  	struct kvm_pmc *pmc = perf_event->overflow_handler_context;
>  	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = pmc_to_pmu(pmc);
>  
> -	if (!test_and_set_bit(pmc->idx,
> -			      (unsigned long *)&pmu->reprogram_pmi)) {
> +	if (!test_and_set_bit(pmc->idx, pmu->reprogram_pmi)) {
>  		__set_bit(pmc->idx, (unsigned long *)&pmu->global_status);
>  		kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_PMU, pmc->vcpu);
>  	}
> @@ -76,8 +75,7 @@ static void kvm_perf_overflow_intr(struct perf_event *perf_event,
>  	struct kvm_pmc *pmc = perf_event->overflow_handler_context;
>  	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = pmc_to_pmu(pmc);
>  
> -	if (!test_and_set_bit(pmc->idx,
> -			      (unsigned long *)&pmu->reprogram_pmi)) {
> +	if (!test_and_set_bit(pmc->idx, pmu->reprogram_pmi)) {
>  		__set_bit(pmc->idx, (unsigned long *)&pmu->global_status);
>  		kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_PMU, pmc->vcpu);
>  
> @@ -137,7 +135,7 @@ static void pmc_reprogram_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u32 type,
>  	}
>  
>  	pmc->perf_event = event;
> -	clear_bit(pmc->idx, (unsigned long*)&pmc_to_pmu(pmc)->reprogram_pmi);
> +	clear_bit(pmc->idx, pmc_to_pmu(pmc)->reprogram_pmi);
>  }
>  
>  void reprogram_gp_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u64 eventsel)
> @@ -253,16 +251,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(reprogram_counter);
>  void kvm_pmu_handle_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> -	u64 bitmask;
>  	int bit;
>  
> -	bitmask = pmu->reprogram_pmi;
> -
> -	for_each_set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&bitmask, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX) {
> +	for_each_set_bit(bit, pmu->reprogram_pmi, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX) {
>  		struct kvm_pmc *pmc = kvm_x86_ops->pmu_ops->pmc_idx_to_pmc(pmu, bit);
>  
>  		if (unlikely(!pmc || !pmc->perf_event)) {
> -			clear_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&pmu->reprogram_pmi);
> +			clear_bit(bit, pmu->reprogram_pmi);
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  
> 

Queued, thanks.

Paolo


  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-22 11:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-13  9:15 [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: x86/vPMU: Efficiency optimization by reusing last created perf_event Like Xu
2019-10-13  9:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] perf/core: Provide a kernel-internal interface to recalibrate event period Like Xu
2019-10-13  9:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] perf/core: Provide a kernel-internal interface to pause perf_event Like Xu
2019-10-14 11:51   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-15  1:47     ` Like Xu
2019-10-13  9:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: x86/vPMU: Reuse perf_event to avoid unnecessary pmc_reprogram_counter Like Xu
2019-10-21  8:12   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-21  8:16     ` Like Xu
2019-10-13  9:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: x86/vPMU: Add lazy mechanism to release perf_event per vPMC Like Xu
2019-10-21  8:45   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-21 14:04     ` Like Xu
2019-10-21 15:28       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-21 10:55         ` [PATCH] KVM: x86/vPMU: Declare kvm_pmu->reprogram_pmi field using DECLARE_BITMAP Like Xu
2019-10-22 11:40           ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2019-10-21  2:26 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: x86/vPMU: Efficiency optimization by reusing last created perf_event Like Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6b7569cf-5977-6992-8c97-cd8a11660f3d@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=like.xu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®