Re: [PATCH 13/21] KVM: TDX: Handle TLB tracking for TDX

["Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>]

On Wed, 2024-09-11 at 14:25 +0800, Xu Yilun wrote:
> > +static void vt_flush_tlb_all(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > +{
> > +       /*
> > +        * TDX calls tdx_track() in tdx_sept_remove_private_spte() to ensure
> > +        * private EPT will be flushed on the next TD enter.
> > +        * No need to call tdx_track() here again even when this callback is
> > as
> > +        * a result of zapping private EPT.
> > +        * Just invoke invept() directly here to work for both shared EPT
> > and
> > +        * private EPT.
> 
> IIUC, private EPT is already flushed in .remove_private_spte(), so in
> theory we don't have to invept() for private EPT?

I think you are talking about the comment, and not an optimization. So changing:
"Just invoke invept() directly here to work for both shared EPT and private EPT"
to just "Just invoke invept() directly here to work for shared EPT".

Seems good to me.