From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org (mout-p-201.mailbox.org [80.241.56.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09A093F23DB; Fri, 4 Sep 2026 05:18:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.171 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788499107; cv=none; b=NNlpDcpq8kVZ0lsaiNTzs8M9VljJtE71Axo2CeJUH7ay9QUJ6V0nM0XyLJ+ULd4WNKPQox3SkA0Zls2xnquTpGfmT0WaMUJp4xzb4vwJzgb4qpKmrSiJWa3DuAnyQWHleMmmniF+qc8YPxpzDM1riGFyAyjbFv5zfPMPR/VJ80k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788499107; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ESHJsvM+IjXiwq4CNcd7g/uiiWkagys2jYNkiN4MOWM=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=KOHdnpjiIkoiJjwTVerUH6mf+pvNkUUz3YZWHMqO23E5GR25O4FBWW+dMIl/tWnfd8/fjAfqMVFNlw2nXtZsC35Jnke0tFXxNAdNAauFwVBwi08ICSaaS5yL/6qIl8w3sCmvxKfttFzufawRuM7976DVeP5wJX2+Eb0toQ9tMEY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b=Z9zNNHOW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.171 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b="Z9zNNHOW" Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [10.196.197.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4hbl9S3YKKzMlGP; Fri, 04 Sep 2026 07:18:20 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1788499100; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ESHJsvM+IjXiwq4CNcd7g/uiiWkagys2jYNkiN4MOWM=; b=Z9zNNHOWbWXKJkqXwhwLnLs+xLxssNWbvEMDRS6oPvUFiMQvg4LK7sLdsKaqpvoxx6BQoT Eqxp1UPJ3oiaxGd+YB1xcUHbhtb/SE90w27MqCvxNUvbddX8eTX0tcPHMweSPrJ+HMhHJ/ Nt78KNxSVjRDqio3LiQhZXvaClLx8l2LcMvL4DTZLtpFp0S1/WMlJfM6vAzFcxqvo94nyg HVE4cf1RSggk09IiLcEABapAswYb4Tks/u0f3yzp3ZW8/J7OD7JE79pkJOsaMPGSSg76mp kvOlyu4bFIbOgffim7ONPSkMH3ykXmBS5vlZxY/ijNS5v9aTOtuz6Eb10QT6Ig== Message-ID: <6ba88e25314a5818f8fb31dc3a2165f6786e890d.camel@mailbox.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] docs: verify/bisect: fix typos, formating and punctuation From: Manuel Ebner To: Randy Dunlap , Thorsten Leemhuis , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 07:18:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4c379bf7-e518-4a06-8b12-134f39a45785@infradead.org> References: <20260903154336.732305-3-manuelebnerli@mailbox.org> <4c379bf7-e518-4a06-8b12-134f39a45785@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MBO-RS-META: ai1mdtu11ks7agtxsu3dssk4rrkm4un8 X-MBO-RS-ID: c40eaf41987a3eae5f4 On Thu, 2026-09-03 at 09:59 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > Hi Manual, >=20 > On 9/3/26 8:43 AM, Manuel Ebner wrote: > > Improve readability. > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Manuel Ebner > > Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap >=20 > It looks like you might be misusing the Reviewed-by: tag here. > My only reply (to v1 of this patch) was: > =C2=A0 https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/0475c09c-e165-41a5-b654-5c6aefea= ab0b@infradead.org/ My thought process was: when I include all you suggestions and your message= ends with > All of the other changes LGTM. you are good with the result. Thus Reviewed. I probably did this a couple more times with you and others. I'm sorry and I'll pay more attention to this. > and in that email I did not write "Reviewed-by: /me". > Just because I commented on it does not mean that it merits > a Reviewed-by: tag. > I.e., a Reviewed-by: tag must be explicitly written by the reviewer > for it to be included in a patch. >=20 > Please see Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for more info, I'll reread it. Thanks for the feedback, Manuel=20 > or ask if you still have questions. >=20 > > --- > >=20 > > [v3] > > =C2=A0+ incorporate Thorsten's suggestions > >=20 > > [v2] > > =C2=A0https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260902115121.687986-2-manuelebnerli= @mailbox.org/ > > =C2=A0+ one more 'your' -> 'you' > > =C2=A0+ 'it' > > =C2=A0+ incorporate Randy's suggestions > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 https://lore.kernel.org/all/0475c09c-e165-41a5-b654-= 5c6aefeaab0b@infradead.org/ > > =C2=A0+ Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap > >=20 > > [v1] > > =C2=A0https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260829055501.581856-2-manuelebnerli= @mailbox.org/ > >=20 > > --- > > =C2=A0.../verify-bugs-and-bisect-regressions.rst=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 | 26= +++++++++---------- > > =C2=A01 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) >=20 > thanks.