From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757357AbcIQCXo (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Sep 2016 22:23:44 -0400 Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:55333 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750774AbcIQCXn (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Sep 2016 22:23:43 -0400 Subject: Re: Runtime failure running sh:qemu in -next due to 'sh: fix copy_from_user()' To: Rich Felker References: <20160916191218.GA12104@roeck-us.net> <20160916194532.GY2356@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20160916205938.GB29767@roeck-us.net> <20160916213141.GB2356@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20160916213918.GO15995@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20160916224744.GB21916@roeck-us.net> <20160916233236.GU15995@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Cc: Al Viro , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yoshinori Sato , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: <6bcec7af-9cbe-2fbe-8d53-fb9cb62fa21f@roeck-us.net> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 19:23:39 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160916233236.GU15995@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated_sender: linux@roeck-us.net X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bh-25.webhostbox.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roeck-us.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: bh-25.webhostbox.net: authenticated_id: linux@roeck-us.net X-Authenticated-Sender: bh-25.webhostbox.net: linux@roeck-us.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/16/2016 04:32 PM, Rich Felker wrote: >> 4.6.3 from kernel.org. > > That is utterly ancient and probaby very buggy. I would recommend 5.x+ > or at the very least 4.7 or 4.8. > Unfortunately that is the latest one available from kernel.org :-(. I'll try to build one myself. Thanks, Guenter