mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr, Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
	Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@gmail.com>,
	Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>,
	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
	Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
	Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Coccinelle: zalloc-simple: Delete function "kmem_cache_alloc" from SmPL rules
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 10:35:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6bee0e11-59ef-b7b1-886e-7abaa30887f2@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNAR27r4j4c1FCh_ObpMpBKXgSP6Vq3P=reA-JKoTji6Q1A@mail.gmail.com>

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 10:20:47 +0100

The deletion for a call of the function "memset" depends on
the specification that a size determination is passed by
the expression "E1".
The function "kmem_cache_alloc" was specified despite of the technical
detail that this function does not get a parameter passed which would
correspond to such a size information.

Thus remove it from the first two SmPL rules and omit the rule "r4".

Link: https://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/v4.15/source/tools/testing/radix-tree/linux/slab.h#L14
Link: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/tools/testing/radix-tree/linux/slab.h?id=f26e52e08ab8e56f528ac14aa7929b3477de5616#n14
Fixes: 5e2d9da5b9ba350a4f13bd3b255be046bcf86465 ("Coccinelle: kzalloc-simple: Add all zero allocating functions")
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci | 41 +-----------------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci
index 92b20913055f..3bee6cdd99ea 100644
--- a/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci
+++ b/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ statement S;
 @@
 
 * x = (T)\(kmalloc(E1, ...)\|vmalloc(E1)\|dma_alloc_coherent(...,E1,...)\|
-  kmalloc_node(E1, ...)\|kmem_cache_alloc(...)\|kmem_alloc(E1, ...)\|
+  kmalloc_node(E1, ...)\|kmem_alloc(E1, ...)\|
   devm_kmalloc(...,E1,...)\|kvmalloc(E1, ...)\|pci_alloc_consistent(...,E1,...)\|
   kvmalloc_node(E1,...)\);
   if ((x==NULL) || ...) S
@@ -88,15 +88,6 @@ statement S;
 - x = (T)kmalloc_node(E1,E2,E3);
 + x = (T)kzalloc_node(E1,E2,E3);
 |
-- x = kmem_cache_alloc(E3,E4);
-+ x = kmem_cache_zalloc(E3,E4);
-|
-- x = (T *)kmem_cache_alloc(E3,E4);
-+ x = kmem_cache_zalloc(E3,E4);
-|
-- x = (T)kmem_cache_alloc(E3,E4);
-+ x = (T)kmem_cache_zalloc(E3,E4);
-|
 - x = kmem_alloc(E1,E2);
 + x = kmem_zalloc(E1,E2);
 |
@@ -268,36 +259,6 @@ x << r3.x;
 msg="WARNING: kzalloc_node should be used for %s, instead of kmalloc_node/memset" % (x)
 coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], msg)
 
-//-----------------------------------------------------------------
-@r4 depends on org || report@
-type T, T2;
-expression x;
-expression E1,E2,E3;
-statement S;
-position p;
-@@
-
- x = (T)kmem_cache_alloc@p(E2,E3);
- if ((x==NULL) || ...) S
- memset((T2)x,0,E1);
-
-@script:python depends on org@
-p << r4.p;
-x << r4.x;
-@@
-
-msg="%s" % (x)
-msg_safe=msg.replace("[","@(").replace("]",")")
-coccilib.org.print_todo(p[0], msg_safe)
-
-@script:python depends on report@
-p << r4.p;
-x << r4.x;
-@@
-
-msg="WARNING: kmem_cache_zalloc should be used for %s, instead of kmem_cache_alloc/memset" % (x)
-coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], msg)
-
 //-----------------------------------------------------------------
 @r5 depends on org || report@
 type T, T2;
-- 
2.16.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-01  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-26 21:40 [PATCH v2] Coccinelle: kzalloc-simple: Add all zero allocating functions Himanshu Jha
2017-12-26 21:52 ` Julia Lawall
2017-12-29 17:22 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-12-29 17:49   ` Julia Lawall
2018-01-02 14:25   ` Rename the SmPL script “kzalloc-….cocci”? SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-02 14:28     ` Julia Lawall
2018-01-02 14:38       ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-02 14:43         ` Julia Lawall
2018-01-02 15:00           ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-08  9:55           ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-03 11:55       ` [PATCH] Coccinelle: Rename the script for a transformation of memory allocations SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-03 12:02         ` Julia Lawall
2018-01-03 12:13           ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-03 12:17             ` Julia Lawall
2018-01-03 12:31               ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-03 12:40                 ` Julia Lawall
2018-01-03 12:45                   ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-04  8:36                   ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-04  8:54                     ` Julia Lawall
2018-01-04  9:43                       ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-17 16:47   ` [v2] Coccinelle: zalloc-simple: Safer transformations with SmPL SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-19 16:14   ` Coccinelle: zalloc-simple: Checking consequences from the usage of at signs in Python strings SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-19 16:18     ` Julia Lawall
2018-01-19 16:43       ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-24  8:41       ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-31 17:28   ` [v2] Coccinelle: zalloc-simple: Delete function “kmem_cache_alloc” from SmPL rules SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-31 17:38     ` Julia Lawall
2018-01-31 17:53       ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-02-01  9:35   ` SF Markus Elfring [this message]
2018-02-01  9:40     ` [PATCH] Coccinelle: zalloc-simple: Delete function "kmem_cache_alloc" " Julia Lawall
2018-02-01 10:17       ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-02-01 10:27         ` Julia Lawall
2018-02-01 11:00           ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-02-03  7:22           ` Coccinelle: zalloc-simple: Checking consistency for " SF Markus Elfring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6bee0e11-59ef-b7b1-886e-7abaa30887f2@users.sourceforge.net \
    --to=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr \
    --cc=Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
    --cc=himanshujha199640@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
    --cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
    --cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®