mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/boot: Don't always pass -mcpu=powerpc when building 32-bit uImage
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2022 07:23:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6bf326c6-0c48-fb53-bb5a-3a4c4f45f6d0@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220827190013.c3odakqxqnqgkzxm@pali>



Le 27/08/2022 à 21:00, Pali Rohár a écrit :
> On Saturday 27 August 2022 20:36:08 Pali Rohár wrote:
>> On Saturday 27 August 2022 18:32:42 Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>> Le 27/08/2022 à 19:36, Pali Rohár a écrit :
>>>> On Saturday 27 August 2022 17:31:10 Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>>>> Le 27/08/2022 à 15:39, Pali Rohár a écrit :
>>>>>> For 32-bit uImage try to use CONFIG_TARGET_CPU option for -mcpu. This fixes
>>>>>> following compiler error when building kernel with powerpc e500 SPE capable
>>>>>> cross compilers:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>        BOOTAS  arch/powerpc/boot/crt0.o
>>>>>>      powerpc-linux-gnuspe-gcc: error: unrecognized argument in option ‘-mcpu=powerpc’
>>>>>>      powerpc-linux-gnuspe-gcc: note: valid arguments to ‘-mcpu=’ are: 8540 8548 native
>>>>>>      make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile:231: arch/powerpc/boot/crt0.o] Error 1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For 64-bit uImage and 64-bit kernels with 32-bit uImage wrapper there is no
>>>>>> change.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Similar change was already introduced for the main powerpc Makefile in
>>>>>> commit 446cda1b21d9 ("powerpc/32: Don't always pass -mcpu=powerpc to the
>>>>>> compiler").
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fixes: 40a75584e526 ("powerpc/boot: Build wrapper for an appropriate CPU")
>>>>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>     arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile | 8 ++++++++
>>>>>>     1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile
>>>>>> index a9cd2ea4a861..f56a5f90a5d8 100644
>>>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile
>>>>>> @@ -44,8 +44,16 @@ else
>>>>>>     BOOTCFLAGS	+= -m64 -mcpu=powerpc64
>>>>>>     endif
>>>>>>     else
>>>>>> +ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
>>>>>> +ifdef CONFIG_TARGET_CPU_BOOL
>>>>>> +BOOTCFLAGS	+= -m32 -mcpu=$(CONFIG_TARGET_CPU)
>>>>>> +else
>>>>>> +BOOTCFLAGS	+= -m32 -mcpu=powerpc
>>>>>
>>>>> You can't do that. You get here only if user has selected
>>>>> TOOLCHAIN_DEFAULT_CPU, in which case you don't want to for -mcpu=powerpc.
>>>>
>>>> So do I understand it correctly that in this branch I should omit -mcpu=powerpc?
>>>
>>> Correct.
>>
>> Ok, I will fix it in v3.
>>
>>>>
>>>>> -mcpu=powerpc is set when user selects CONFIG_POWERPC_CPU, in which case
>>>>> CONFIG_TARGET_CPU_BOOL is set as well.
>>>>>
>>>>>> +endif
>>>>>> +else
>>>>>>     BOOTCFLAGS	+= -m32 -mcpu=powerpc
>>>>>
>>>>> Same, for PPC64 I think you don't want that either, unless the
>>>>> CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU has been selected in which case
>>>>> CONFIG_TARGET_CPU_BOOL is not set.
>>>>>
>>>>> When CONFIG_TARGET_CPU_BOOL is set for PPC64 you also want
>>>>> -mcpu=$(CONFIG_TARGET_CPU)
>>>>
>>>> I understand that this branch is called for PPC64 build with 32-bit
>>>> uImage wrapper. So in this case should not be used TARGET_CPU as it
>>>> would be 64-bit and not 32-bit as requited for 32-bit uImage wrapper.
>>>
>>> Why ?
>>>
>>> -mcpu=e6500 -m32 works as far as I can see.
>>
>> Hm... I did not know that. Ok, if you want I will put it into
>> -m32 -mcpu=$(CONFIG_TARGET_CPU) branch too.
> 
> And when CONFIG_TARGET_CPU_BOOL is not set but CONFIG_PPC64_BOOT_WRAPPER
> is, should be -mcpu=powerpc64le or -mcpu=powerpc64 still passed?

Not sure, so keep it like that, will change later if needed.

> 
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, in this change I'm touching only PPC32 build, so all PPC64 stay
>>>> as it was before.
>>>>
>>>>>>     endif
>>>>>> +endif
>>>>>>     
>>>>>>     BOOTCFLAGS	+= -isystem $(shell $(BOOTCC) -print-file-name=include)
>>>>>>     

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-28  7:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-20 10:52 [PATCH] powerpc/boot: Fix compilation of uImage for e500 platforms Pali Rohár
2022-08-23 16:57 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-08-24 12:02   ` Pali Rohár
2022-08-27 13:39 ` [PATCH v2] powerpc/boot: Don't always pass -mcpu=powerpc when building 32-bit uImage Pali Rohár
2022-08-27 17:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2022-08-27 17:36     ` Pali Rohár
2022-08-27 18:32       ` Christophe Leroy
2022-08-27 18:36         ` Pali Rohár
2022-08-27 19:00           ` Pali Rohár
2022-08-28  7:23             ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2022-08-28  9:19               ` Pali Rohár
2022-08-28  9:56 ` [PATCH v3] " Pali Rohár
2022-08-28 17:33   ` Christophe Leroy
2022-08-28 17:39     ` Christophe Leroy
2022-08-28 17:41       ` Pali Rohár
2022-08-28 17:43         ` Christophe Leroy
2022-08-29  8:54           ` Pali Rohár
2022-10-09 11:06             ` Pali Rohár
2022-11-01 22:12               ` Pali Rohár
2022-11-02 14:05                 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-11-26 16:30                   ` Pali Rohár
2022-12-07 13:39                     ` Christophe Leroy
2022-12-08 19:16                       ` Pali Rohár
2022-12-08 19:16           ` Pali Rohár
2022-12-08 19:57             ` Christophe Leroy
2022-12-24 17:44               ` Pali Rohár
2023-01-22 11:19                 ` Pali Rohár
2023-01-25  7:41                   ` Christophe Leroy
2023-02-20  7:28                     ` Christophe Leroy
2023-02-20  8:08                       ` Pali Rohár

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6bf326c6-0c48-fb53-bb5a-3a4c4f45f6d0@csgroup.eu \
    --to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=joel@jms.id.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=pali@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®