From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A225AC04E69 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:18:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231299AbjHJOSf (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2023 10:18:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52524 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233590AbjHJOSe (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2023 10:18:34 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1035.google.com (mail-pj1-x1035.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1035]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07CBC125; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 07:18:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1035.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-26814e27a9eso565752a91.0; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 07:18:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1691677113; x=1692281913; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=/Ton7upj4EzEtC/CGoqmP056/FRqWJ9mTnKI+9e40N0=; b=GIWQhvnGaYPZU+xnO6aSJfNOCRLLSq5PfjzuP9TILvtPpIzXRYXFwG8NiX/2OkXNKH zJsit8J2dTgTI6MWKSiJJx5MaxKqo0mw+fPfkiAbDmz/sOKSICZmEmYjCyA6992qz/oP 8J3AFz+q7IBSn2FXzmFK/1te+gufNAX4aGsnya/DFsml6paMUNpwt6XkECEfzaM4yh5A lu26j+JtAmWMLOOd/gFrR/7cd7PEGzgpIMZ51ZcZBafkB/2tz1gn6xohBkLfQ9vzUN2C kFCodbC/qxSJTKWTrg3Pr8HHKRB5yUJR1G04Psfrd55/A+62bpDlFxBXsCNVWMcV+ahM TOeQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1691677113; x=1692281913; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=/Ton7upj4EzEtC/CGoqmP056/FRqWJ9mTnKI+9e40N0=; b=JTdPNIimeZHUWHG4GcWSW9m+ymQ74xWJ7q2C5hqr0vhRrEFQtasgERL2e6MrLcEfEq UzcGfL0A+an43lmfsLHlhl+7S0MeFtc7XP9mhg++lNN3CEPuU+jQ2+FYtkazuiL3ML6v 02uBExUGqO/Jkf5g1AC0ZPOZG1Q27Yg+ERjkXa/FCDkQbFYAavAHdqwqkdKdBE7BL6Tz WjZNwobDuMsPsAj9VB8nKIf+Xpn5HEMBn4/tJjm3nhTrkMHUym0t4ODrSmMNRWK0LAum 1cVVf9AvBe2Zaygk1U+Mjx7fbnkR/nsl2dOAKmrhmobRgfAF7ICKAUGKIUFvDnwQNn5q No/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxUEefaVhp0wjXk+MpXFneUONOTfj9qn47+7PBaqWJcyv5NRgEh pE/o9Dq0jWnkZLJ6yQH+dR4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGSFVwzenWIyUpQ6JUC6obtbwujmz8qQ8dA/9VsWzrZJBbF+I3FTqNyNZiaDRB2r2hHbw5DPQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:7609:b0:268:c569:f2af with SMTP id s9-20020a17090a760900b00268c569f2afmr1916988pjk.7.1691677113287; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 07:18:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.105] ([103.124.138.83]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ji22-20020a170903325600b001b830d8bc40sm1822713plb.74.2023.08.10.07.18.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Aug 2023 07:18:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6bff248f-64ae-2512-ccbd-661ccdfe6542@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 21:18:28 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.14.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: wireless: ralink: rt2x00: "foo* bar" should be "foo *bar" Content-Language: en-US To: Johannes Berg , stf_xl@wp.pl, helmut.schaa@googlemail.com, kvalo@kernel.org Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <18520fa625b8a901314c65bb8e557091@208suo.com> <36e36d94e81da4342283aac471fb5a7bd3eb9f65.camel@sipsolutions.net> <5fcffcebca2ef9b8c276e5f4b4464d888649a70b.camel@sipsolutions.net> From: Bagas Sanjaya In-Reply-To: <5fcffcebca2ef9b8c276e5f4b4464d888649a70b.camel@sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/08/2023 13:53, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 09:10 +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: >>> And the email address doesn't even work, only about two weeks after you >>> sent this patch? >>> >>> hanyu001@208suo.com >>> host mx1.qiye.aliyun.com [47.246.146.58] >>> SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:: >>> 554 RCPT (hanyu001@208suo.com) dosn't exist >>> >> >> No wonder why @208suo.com people ignore reviews from mailing list - their >> addresses are send-only without real mailboxes... >> >> BTW, how can you get above error message? I'm curious. > > That was just the error message I got back from my mail server, > presumably now that you actually tried emailing them, you also got one. > Ack, I also got above delivery failure notification, hence removing Yu Han from address list. > I'm beginning to think we should just block that whole domain until > someone there is actually willing to _interact_, not just throw > (garbage!) patches over the fence. > Ack too! I'm leaning towards blocking for sanity of myself and mailing lists. IMO, we should have done the same against @cdjrlc.com addresses when they sent spelling fixes that are 50-50 correct but they also ignored change-requested reviews. Thanks! -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara